Allow supreme court justices to use partisan affiliation
HB 838 would revise election laws to allow candidates for Chief Justice and Justice of the Supreme Court to indicate a political party affiliation. These candidates could include their party affiliation on their nomination declaration, which would then appear on primary and general election ballots. The bill also permits these candidates to publicly announce their political affiliations and campaign endorsements. If a candidate does not indicate a party affiliation, the word "Nonpartisan" would appear next to their name on the ballot. This changes the current nonpartisan nature of these specific judicial races.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Failed
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Mar 18, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0838_1.pdf
→
HB0838_1(1).pdf
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates Montana's election laws to allow candidates for nonpartisan judicial offices (Supreme Court Chief Justice and Justice) to indicate their political party affiliation on nomination declarations and announce it on ballots. It also clarifies rules for how primary ballots are arranged for these specific offices and modifies restrictions on using party names in campaign materials.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of political party disclosure to include candidates for nonpartisan judicial offices, which previously were not explicitly covered in these specific sections.
ELIGIBILITY
Added the ability for Supreme Court Chief Justice and Justice candidates to indicate political party affiliation on their nomination declarations.
REQUIREMENT
Added the ability for Supreme Court Chief Justice and Justice candidates to announce their political party affiliation or campaign endorsements on ballots.
Modified primary ballot arrangement rules to ensure judicial candidates are listed with their party affiliation if indicated, or marked as 'Nonpartisan' if not.
Modified rules regarding the use of party names in campaign materials to accommodate the new disclosure requirements for judicial candidates.
Floor votes · House Apr 7, 2025
How they voted
46–54
Failed
Total votes 100
Apr 7, 2025
D
Democratic42
100% Nay
R
Republican58
79% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 7, 2025
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (46-54)
house
Mar 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 18, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Brandon Ler
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 838
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 838. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline