Create the crime of human smuggling
HB 709 sought to establish the crime of "human smuggling" in Montana, targeting individuals and entities who knowingly transport or harbor people who have unlawfully entered the United States without federal inspection. Individuals convicted of this crime would face penalties including imprisonment, a substantial fine, or both. Entities found guilty would lose their eligibility for certain state tax exemptions. Additionally, the bill included provisions for the criminal forfeiture of property, such as vehicles and funds, if used in or derived from the crime of human smuggling.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 24, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
LC2134.pdf
→
HB0709_1.pdf
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill text was updated from a committee version (LC 2134) to the official House Bill number (HB 709), and a critical legal definition was modified to broaden the scope of the crime. The original text required smugglers to know the person had entered illegally, while the new text adds that it is also a crime if the smuggler knows the person has not complied with their immigration status conditions. This change makes it easier to prosecute human smugglers who transport individuals with valid but expired visas or other non-compliant statuses.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded by redefining the legal definition of human smuggling to include individuals who have violated immigration status conditions, not just those who entered the country unlawfully.
DEFINITION
The definition of human smuggling was changed to include transporting or harboring individuals who have not complied with immigration status conditions set at the time of entry, in addition to those who entered in violation of law.
TECHNICAL
The bill number was updated from LC 2134 to HB 709, and sponsor names were added to the header.
Floor votes · House Mar 5, 2025
How they voted
62–37
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 100
Mar 5, 2025
D
Democratic42
85% Nay
R
Republican58
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Mar 5, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (62-37-1)
house
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kathy Love
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 709
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 709. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline