Allow police chief to appoint certain officers as court officer
HB 581 revises Montana law to allow city police chiefs to appoint full-time, paid "special services officers" as court officers, rather than restricting appointments to part-time or volunteer roles. The bill updates definitions in Montana law to clarify that special services officers (who perform non-patrol duties requiring specialized skills) may now be appointed as court officers under supervision. This directly affects municipal courts and police departments, enabling them to use officers with specialized training for court duties like serving process or attending sessions. The change requires officers to be authorized to carry firearms and work under the police chief’s direction, as specified in amended sections 3-6-303 and 7-32-201 of Montana Code.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0581_1(5).pdf
→
HB0581_2.pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill expands the role of court officers in Montana by allowing them to transport defendants to detention facilities after a court remand, which was previously not explicitly authorized. It also clarifies that full-time, paid special service officers can serve as court officers, broadening eligibility beyond just part-time or volunteer roles. Additionally, the bill reorders and slightly modifies the definitions section of the relevant statutes to better align with these new operational capabilities.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of authority for court officers to include transporting defendants to places of detention, and broadens the eligibility for court officers to include full-time, paid special service officers.
ENFORCEMENT
Added explicit authority for court officers to transport a defendant to a place of detention when a court remands them into custody.
ELIGIBILITY
Modified the definition of court officers to explicitly include full-time, paid special service officers, whereas previous language focused on reserve or part-time paid members.
DEFINITION
Reordered and slightly adjusted the statutory definitions of auxiliary officers, reserve officers, and special services officers to clarify roles and align with the new enforcement authority.
Floor votes · House Mar 7, 2025
How they voted
99–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 100
Mar 7, 2025
D
Democratic42
100% Yea
R
Republican58
98% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 28, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 14, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 7, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (99-0-1)
house
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Denise Baum
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 581
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 581. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline