Provide for evaluations of defendants in detention centers or state prisons
HB 236 aimed to allow mental health evaluations for criminal defendants, used to determine their fitness to proceed in court, to be conducted within detention centers or state prisons. It directed the Department of Public Health and Human Services to create rules for these facilities, covering aspects like defendant care, security for evaluators, and the use of remote communication for examinations. The bill also outlined which entities, such as the courts or public defender's office, would be responsible for covering the costs of these evaluations and related expenses. This would have impacted criminal defendants undergoing such evaluations and the correctional facilities hosting them.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 16, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0236_2(8).pdf
→
HB0236_2(9).pdf
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the rules for conducting mental fitness examinations for defendants at detention centers and clarifies who pays for these exams. It requires the Department of Public Health and Human Services to create specific rules for remote examinations and qualification determinations. The bill also amends existing statutes to detail how costs are allocated between the court, the defendant, and the state depending on who requested the exam.
Scope change
The scope expanded to include formal rulemaking requirements for remote examinations and clarified the definition of 'other associated expenses' to include medical and dental care.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new section requiring the Department of Public Health and Human Services to adopt rules for conducting remote examinations and determining when follow-up exams are needed.
Updated the statute to allow the court to order a defendant's privately retained examiner to witness and participate in the examination process.
FISCAL
Modified the statute to specify that costs for exams performed by state employees using state facilities cannot be charged to the court or public defender offices.
DEFINITION
Added a specific definition for 'other associated expenses' to include medical, dental, and medication costs incurred during the commitment for examination.
Floor votes · House Feb 19, 2025
How they voted
82–18
Passed
Total votes 100
Feb 19, 2025
D
Democratic42
100% Yea
R
Republican58
68% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Mar 19, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 1, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 19, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (82-18)
house
Feb 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Human Services
lower
Feb 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Human Services
lower
Feb 1, 2025
Amended
(H) Tabled in Committee - (H) Human Services
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Human Services
lower
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
James Reavis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 236
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 236. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline