Limit liability of agricultural vehicles
HB 212 limits liability for agricultural vehicles operated on Montana highways, directly affecting farmers, ranchers, and operators of specific farm equipment. The bill sets a $750,000 cap on damages per claim and $1.5 million per incident for owners, lessees, or operators of qualifying vehicles. It defines "agricultural vehicles" to include farm tractors, implements of husbandry, self-propelled farm equipment, and vehicles hauling hay or straw. Insurers remain liable for excess damages only if they provide written coverage beyond these limits.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 15, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 8 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0212_3(5).pdf
→
HB0212_3(6).pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill underwent significant formatting and numbering reorganization, shifting from a narrative style to a structured definition list. Substantively, the definition of 'Commercial motor vehicle' was expanded to include vehicles with a gross vehicle weight of 26,001 pounds or more, broadening the scope of vehicles subject to commercial regulations. Other definitions like 'Bus' and 'Authorized agent' were renumbered but retained their original meanings.
Scope change
The scope of the bill was expanded to include heavier vehicles (26,001+ lbs) under the definition of 'Commercial motor vehicle', while the overall applicability of other sections was reorganized for clarity.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'Commercial motor vehicle' was expanded to include vehicles with a gross vehicle weight of 26,001 pounds or more, in addition to the existing gross combination weight criteria.
The definition of 'Bus' was renumbered and slightly reworded to clarify that it includes vehicles designed for carrying more than 10 passengers, excluding taxicabs.
TECHNICAL
The entire document structure was renumbered and reorganized from a narrative format into a structured list of definitions, improving readability and consistency.
Floor votes · House Mar 5, 2025
How they voted
51–47
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 100
Mar 5, 2025
D
Democratic42
97% Nay
R
Republican58
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Mar 26, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Highways and Transportation
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Highways and Transportation
upper
Mar 5, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (51-47-2)
house
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Transportation
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Transportation
lower
Feb 4, 2025
Committee
(H) Rereferred to Committee - (H) Transportation
lower
Jan 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Transportation
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Transportation
lower
Jan 15, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Transportation
lower
Jan 15, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ed Byrne
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 212
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 212. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline