SB 1067 Missouri Senate · 2026 Regular Session

Establishes the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, which provides procedures for dismissal of actions based on public expression

Summary
SB 1067 - This act establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act". Currently, any action against a person for conduct or speech undertaken or made in connection with a public hearing or meeting in a quasi-judicial proceeding before a tribunal or decision-making body of the state or a political subdivision thereof is subject to a special motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or motion for summary judgment and any such motion shall be considered by the court on a priority or expedited basis. This act repeals this provision and creates procedures for dismissal of causes of action asserted in a civil action based on a person's: (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Missouri Constitution, on a matter of public concern. However, this act shall not apply to a cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit, as described in the act, or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity; (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the sale or lease of such goods or services. No later than 60 days after a party is served with a complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action covered by this act, or at a later time upon a showing of good cause, a party may file a special motion to dismiss. The court shall hear and rule on such motion no later than 60 days after the filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing to allow for limited discovery or upon good cause. However, this act provides that the court shall hear and rule on the motion for dismissal no later than 60 days after the order allowing for discovery. This act provides that all other proceedings between the moving party and the responding party in the action, including discovery and any pending hearings or motions, shall be stayed upon the filing of the special motion to dismiss. Additionally, this act provides that the court may stay, upon motion by the moving party, a hearing or motion involving another party or discovery by another party if a ruling on such hearing or motion or discovery relates to a legal or factual issue. Any stay pursuant to this act shall remain in effect until the entry of an order ruling on the special motion to dismiss and the expiration of the time to appeal the order. A moving party may appeal an order denying the special motion to dismiss in whole or in part within 21 days of such order. If a party appeals an order ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that all proceedings between all parties shall be stayed until the conclusion of the appeal. The court may allow discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the requirements of this act and such information is not reasonably available without discovery. Additionally, a motion for costs and expenses, voluntary dismissal, or a motion to sever shall not be stayed. During a stay, the court upon good cause may hear and rule on any motions unrelated to the special motion to dismiss and any motions seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety. In ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment. The court shall dismiss the cause of action with prejudice if: (1) The moving party has established that the cause of action is covered by this act; (2) The responding party has failed to establish that this act does not apply to the cause of action; and (3) Either the responding party failed to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action, or the moving party has established that the responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss pursuant to this act shall not affect the moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and reasonable litigation expenses. Additionally, if the moving party prevails on the motion, this act provides that such costs, fees, and expenses shall be awarded to the moving party. A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss establishes that the moving party prevailed on the motion. The responding party shall be entitled to such costs, fees, and expenses if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with the intent to delay the proceeding. Finally, this act applies to causes of action filed or asserted on or after August 28, 2026. This act is identical to provisions in the truly agreed to and finally passed CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 835 & 1111 (2026), in SCS/SB 1468 (2026), SB 503 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 615 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 1259 (2025), and SB 1293 (2024) and is substantially similar to HB 2666 (2026), provisions in HCS/HB 83 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), HB 1092 (2025), in SCS/SB 897 (2024), HB 1785 (2024), in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), in CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), SB 432 (2023), HB 750 (2023), SB 1219 (2022), in HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 968 (2022), HB 2624 (2022), and HB 1151 (2021). KATIE O'BRIEN
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jul 2026
Introduced Dec 1, 2025 Signed Jul 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

5144H.02C - House Committee Substitute 5144S.01P - Perfected · 5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was significantly streamlined by removing a massive list of unrelated labor and municipal statutes, replacing them with a single new section focused on protecting free speech. This change shifts the legislation from a broad repeal of various existing laws to a specific 'Uniform Public Expression Protection Act' designed to shield individuals from lawsuits when they speak out on matters of public concern.
Scope change
The bill's scope was drastically narrowed from repealing over thirty-five existing sections across multiple legal topics (including worker compensation and sheriff salaries) to repealing only one specific section and enacting one new section dedicated to civil actions based on public expression.
SCOPE

Removed a comprehensive repeal of thirty-four unrelated statutes covering topics such as permanent disability compensation, sheriff's attorney fees, and various other civil codes.

Added a new 'Uniform Public Expression Protection Act' that prevents civil lawsuits against individuals for communicating in government proceedings or exercising free speech rights on matters of public concern.

DEFINITION

Defined key terms including 'Governmental unit' (cities, counties, agencies) and 'Person' (individuals, businesses, nonprofits) to establish who is protected under the new act.

ENFORCEMENT

Established a legal mechanism requiring courts to dismiss lawsuits with prejudice if the plaintiff cannot prove the speech was not related to public concern or government proceedings.

REQUIREMENT

Mandated that courts must hear motions to dismiss these specific types of lawsuits within sixty days to ensure swift resolution.

Floor votes

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
16
Committee
15
Jul 13, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by Governor
executive
May 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Duly Enrolled Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions & Ethics Committee
upper
May 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
Truly Agreed To and Finally Passed
upper
May 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
H Third Read and Passed
lower
May 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Do Pass H Fiscal Review
lower
May 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Voted Do Pass H Fiscal Review
lower
May 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Voted Do Pass H Fiscal Review
lower
May 7, 2026
Committee
Referred H Fiscal Review Committee
lower
May 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Reported Do Pass H Rules - Legislative
lower
May 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Voted Do Pass H Rules - Legislative
lower
Apr 30, 2026
Committee
HCS Referred H Rules - Legislative
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Reported Do Pass H Judiciary
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Voted Do Pass H Judiciary
lower
Apr 21, 2026
Committee
Referred H Judiciary
lower
Apr 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
S Third Read and Passed
upper
Mar 31, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Truly Perfected S Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions and Ethics Committee
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Voted Do Pass S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
upper
Jan 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
Hearing Conducted S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
upper
Dec 1, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mike Henderson
Mike Henderson
RRepublican
MO
3