Modifies provisions relating to law enforcement interception of unmanned aircraft systems
HB 2587 restricts drone operations near specific facilities to enhance security. It prohibits flying drones within 400 feet vertically over correctional centers (prisons), large open-air venues (like stadiums with 500+ capacity), or mental health hospitals without authorization. Exceptions allow facility staff, law enforcement, utilities, and others with written permission or official duties. Violations are typically infractions, but delivering weapons, drugs, or aiding escapes escalates penalties to felonies (class B, C, or D). The bill requires facilities to post 11x14 inch warning signs and permits law enforcement to intercept drones posing immediate threats.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 29, 2025
Last action May 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Perfected
→
Senate Committee Substitute
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was revised from a House draft to a Senate Committee version, which significantly expanded the definition of who can legally fly drones near sensitive facilities and added new rules for law enforcement. The Senate version clarifies that facility owners and operators can now fly drones for maintenance and monitoring without needing specific permission from a president or CEO, and it introduces a new exemption for commercial drone operators who are federally authorized. Additionally, the Senate version added detailed definitions for law enforcement actions, such as 'mitigate,' which covers monitoring, warning, or disabling unauthorized drones.
Scope change
The bill's scope was broadened to include commercial drone operators who have federal authorization and to explicitly allow facility employees to operate drones for facility maintenance and monitoring.
ELIGIBILITY
Expanded the list of people allowed to fly drones near sensitive facilities to include the 'owner or operator' of the facility, not just employees acting on specific orders.
Added a new exemption allowing commercial drone operators to fly near sensitive facilities if they are authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to operate lawfully in that airspace.
DEFINITION
Introduced a new definition for 'mitigate,' which legally defines actions law enforcement can take against unauthorized drones, such as tracking, warning, or disabling them.
Updated the definition of 'Authorized individuals' to include specific references to federal laws and the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
13
Committee
15
May 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Do Pass (S)
upper
Apr 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Voted Do Pass (S)
upper
Apr 20, 2026
Committee
Referred: Fiscal Oversight(S)
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
SCS Reported Do Pass (S)
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
SCS Voted Do Pass (S)
upper
Mar 12, 2026
Committee
Second read and referred: Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence(S)
upper
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Emergency Clause Adopted (H) - AYES: 133 NOES: 11 PRESENT: 2
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Read and Passed (H) - AYES: 140 NOES: 2 PRESENT: 2
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 7 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
Voted Do Pass (H)
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred: Fiscal Review(H)
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Adopted (H)
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 11 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Voted Do Pass (H)
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Committee
Referred: Rules - Administrative(H)
lower
Feb 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 18 NOES: 0 PRESENT: 0
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
lower
Jan 8, 2026
Committee
Referred: Crime and Public Safety(H)
lower
Dec 29, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled (H)
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Jones
RRepublican
Co
Bill Irwin
RRepublican
Co
Brandon Phelps
RRepublican
Co
Mike Steinmeyer
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2587
Scope: MO
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2587. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline