William Huizenga
U.S. House District 4
2026 general election.
Incumbents
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jul 15, 2026.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| William Huizenga Republican incumbent | $4,093,991 | $2,268,747 | $1,580,550 |
| Sean Mccann Democratic | $2,620,011 | $1,686,240 | $316,050 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Jul 15, 2026.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: William Huizenga at $4,093,991. Lowest: Sean Mccann at $2,620,011. The largest reported value sets this scale at $4,093,991.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: William Huizenga at $2,268,747. Lowest: Sean Mccann at $1,686,240. The largest reported value sets this scale at $2,268,747.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: William Huizenga at $1,580,550. Lowest: Sean Mccann at $316,050. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,580,550.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: William Huizenga at $511,996. Lowest: Sean Mccann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $511,996.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Highest outside spending opposing: William Huizenga at $1,132,704. Lowest: Sean Mccann at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,132,704.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $723,20044.0% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $281,00017.1% | $135,00043.9% |
| Trade association PACs | $317,70019.3% | $5,0001.6% |
| Non-connected committees | $158,8009.7% | $76,95025.0% |
| Membership organization PACs | $86,5095.3% | $13,8004.5% |
| Labor union PACs | $6,0000.4% | $55,00017.9% |
| Other candidates' committees | $28,0001.7% | $22,0007.1% |
| Corporations without capital stock | $42,1002.6% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,643,309 | $307,750 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $267,50020.0% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $197,10014.8% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $189,00014.2% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $99,5007.5% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $43,0003.2% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $32,5002.4% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $3,0000.2% | $20,00013.3% |
| Defense Defense | $21,2001.6% | $0 |
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $19,7001.5% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $15,0001.1% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $14,5001.1% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $8,5000.6% | $5,0003.3% |
| Accounting Professional services | $12,5000.9% | $0 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $12,5000.9% | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $12,5000.9% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $11,0000.8% | $0 |
| Building trades unions Labor | $0 | $10,0006.6% |
| Industrial unions Labor | $0 | $10,0006.6% |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $10,0000.7% | $0 |
| Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $10,0006.6% |
| Public sector unions Labor | $0 | $10,0006.6% |
| Technology Communications and technology | $9,5000.7% | $0 |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $9,0000.7% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $8,5000.6% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $3,0000.2% | $5,0003.3% |
| Health insurance Health | $6,0000.4% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $5,0000.4% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $5,0000.4% | $0 |
| LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $2,5001.7% |
| Gun control Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $1,0000.7% |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $1,0000.1% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $309,000 | $157,000 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $318,30923.9% | $77,25051.2% |
| Itemized total | $1,643,309 | $307,750 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $511,996100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $511,996 | $0 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptocurrency and blockchain Finance, insurance, and real estate | $511,996100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $511,996 | $0 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $1,132,704100.0% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,132,704 | $0 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | William Huizenga Republican | Sean Mccann Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental advocacy Ideological and single-issue | $990,13487.4% | $0 |
| Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue | $117,57010.4% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $25,0002.2% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,132,704 | $0 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Huizenga Republican | $137,664 | 13 | Jul 16 to Aug 1, 2026 | $137,664 still provisional |
| Sean Mccann Democratic | $101,299 | 8 | Jul 19 to Jul 31, 2026 | $101,299 still provisional |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Shafina Che Barnett (Green): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.