AK
Anil Kumar
U.S. House District 11
2026 general election · 1 open.
Incumbents
No incumbent is running.
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2026 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Jul 15, 2026, except where a row says otherwise.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anil Kumar Independent FEC data through Jun 30, 2026 | $712,923 | $407,720 | $5,000 |
| Ethan Baker Republican | $141,876 | $121,125 | $1,000 |
| Jeremy Moss Democratic | $1,485,178 | $352,517 | $141,950 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Each candidate's own coverage end date is in the table above.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: Jeremy Moss at $1,485,178. Lowest: Ethan Baker at $141,876. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,485,178.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: Anil Kumar at $407,720. Lowest: Ethan Baker at $121,125. The largest reported value sets this scale at $407,720.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: Jeremy Moss at $141,950. Lowest: Ethan Baker at $1,000. The largest reported value sets this scale at $141,950.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: Jeremy Moss at $399,495. Lowest: Anil Kumar at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $399,495.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Highest outside spending opposing: Jeremy Moss at $20,000. Lowest: Anil Kumar at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $20,000.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $5,000100.0% | $44,20034.9% |
| Leadership PACs | $0 | $29,50023.3% |
| Labor union PACs | $0 | $20,00015.8% |
| Corporate PACs | $0 | $16,50013.0% |
| Other candidates' committees | $0 | $10,0007.9% |
| Membership organization PACs | $0 | $5,0504.0% |
| Trade association PACs | $0 | $1,5001.2% |
| Itemized total | $5,000 | $126,750 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Building trades unions Labor | $0 | $10,00011.5% |
| LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $10,00011.5% |
| Industrial unions Labor | $0 | $5,0005.7% |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $0 | $5,0005.7% |
| Public sector unions Labor | $0 | $5,0005.7% |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $0 | $5,0005.7% |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $2,0002.3% |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $0 | $1,5001.7% |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $0 | $1,0001.1% |
| Committees not yet categorized | $5,000100.0% | $42,75049.0% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $0 | $39,500 |
| Itemized total | $5,000 | $126,750 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $0 | $399,495100.0% |
| Itemized total | $0 | $399,495 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Technology Communications and technology | $0 | $294,61373.7% |
| LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue | $0 | $104,88226.3% |
| Itemized total | $0 | $399,495 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $0 | $20,000100.0% |
| Itemized total | $0 | $20,000 |
Independent spending opposing each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | Anil Kumar Independent | Jeremy Moss Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Committees not yet categorized | $0 | $20,000100.0% |
| Itemized total | $0 | $20,000 |
These candidates are compared in the table above but have no stored breakdown of where their committee money came from, so they are named here rather than shown as a column of zeroes.
- Ethan Baker: no breakdown is stored for this record yet
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Baker Republican | $3,500 | 1 | Jul 20 to Jul 20, 2026 | $3,500 still provisional |
| Jeremy Moss Democratic | $155,559 | 7 | Jul 19 to Jul 31, 2026 | $155,559 still provisional |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Farid Ishac (Libertarian): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
- Ryan Teasdale (Green): This candidate is not linked to a federal candidate identity, so FEC coverage does not apply.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.