HR 1353 United States House · 118th Congress

Advanced, Local Emergency Response Telecommunications Parity Act

HR 1353, the ALERT Parity Act, creates a new framework for emergency telecommunications service in areas lacking commercial mobile coverage. It requires the FCC to establish rules within 18 months allowing providers to apply for permission to deliver two specific services: transmitting emergency alerts to devices and providing emergency information to 911 centers (like enhanced 911), without becoming FCC licensees. Providers must certify their technical capability, commit to using spectrum solely for emergency service, and demonstrate resilience against disasters. This directly affects residents in unserved areas during outages or disasters by ensuring critical alert and 911 connectivity remains available.
Sub-Topics: Broadband Access Telecommunications Tags: Emergency Management Public Safety
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2023
Committee Review
Apr 2023
House Passage
Apr 2023
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Mar 3, 2023 Last action Apr 27, 2023
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in House Engrossed in House · 7 edits · Apr 26, 2023
MODERATE
The Engrossed version of HR 1353 makes several substantive changes: it replaces formal 'certifications' with 'demonstrations' for applicants, adds a requirement that spectrum holders must reasonably engage and respond timely to consent requests, expands interference protection to adjacent geographic areas, inserts a new annual reporting requirement to Congress, and adds an explicit prohibition on the FCC regulating private agreements about spectrum sharing for emergency connectivity service.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed in one important way: the new rules-of-construction provision explicitly prevents the FCC from regulating private agreements about spectrum access terms, conditions, or rates for emergency connectivity service. At the same time, the scope of interference protection was broadened to cover adjacent geographic areas, and a new transparency mechanism (annual congressional reporting) was added.
REQUIREMENT

Section (b) was retitled from 'Certifications' to 'Demonstrations,' and the language requiring applicants to 'certify' was changed to 'demonstrate.' The evidentiary language in subsection (1) was also simplified, removing the requirement that evidence be 'included in the application.'

Section (d)(1) now requires spectrum consent to be 'voluntary' and adds a new obligation: any entity receiving a consent request must 'reasonably engage' with the requesting provider and make a determination 'in a timely manner.' This creates an affirmative duty on spectrum holders to respond rather than simply allowing them to ignore requests.

SCOPE

Section (d)(2) expanded interference protection from covering only 'such area' to covering 'such area or an adjacent geographic area,' broadening the scope of protected spectrum users.

A new rules-of-construction provision (now subsection (h)(1)) explicitly states that nothing in the section gives the FCC authority to regulate the terms, conditions, or rates of private agreements between parties to facilitate emergency connectivity service. This carves out a significant limitation on FCC regulatory power over spectrum-sharing deals.

ENFORCEMENT

A new section (g) requires the FCC to submit annual reports to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and Senate Commerce Committee detailing every instance emergency connectivity service was provided and every instance a spectrum holder declined to grant consent.

TECHNICAL

Multiple cross-references were updated from 'subsection (h)(5)(B)' to 'subsection (i)(5)(B)' to reflect the renumbering of the definitions section caused by the insertion of the new reporting requirement as subsection (g).

Various heading capitalization changes were made throughout (e.g., 'Rulemaking Required' to 'Rulemaking required,' 'Publication of List of Providers' to 'Publication of list of providers'). These are formatting-only changes.

Floor votes · House Apr 26, 2023

How they voted

4221
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 434
Apr 26, 2023
D Democratic213
208 Yea 5
97% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican220
213 Yea 1 Nay 6
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
19
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Apr 27, 2023
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
upper
Apr 26, 2023
Introduced
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 422 - 1 (Roll no. 197). (text: 4/25/2023 CR H1922-1923)
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 422 - 1 (Roll no. 197). (text: 4/25/2023 CR H1922-1923)
lower
Apr 25, 2023
Introduced
Mr. Latta moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
lower
Apr 24, 2023
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-39.
lower
Mar 24, 2023
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 46 - 0.
lower
Mar 24, 2023
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
lower
Mar 23, 2023
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
lower
Mar 8, 2023
Lower · Passed
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 0 .
lower
Mar 8, 2023
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
lower
Mar 3, 2023
Committee
Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
lower
Mar 3, 2023
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
lower
Mar 3, 2023
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors