Liquor: other; payment of administrative fee to wholesaler for a payment dishonored by a financial institution; require. Amends sec. 903b of 1998 PA 58 (MCL 436.1903b).
SB 88 requires liquor retailers to pay administrative fees to wholesalers when payments are bounced due to insufficient funds. It directly affects liquor retailers who make dishonored payments and wholesalers who collect these fees. The bill establishes a progressive fee structure: $50 for the first bounced payment, increasing to $250 for the fifth or subsequent bounced payments within a 12-month period. Wholesalers must charge these fees for each bounced payment, with higher fees applying for repeated offenses within the same 12-month window. This changes the existing law by adding specific fee amounts and requiring wholesalers to enforce them.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2025
Last action Mar 12, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Senate Introduced Bill
→
As Passed by the Senate
·
3 edits
·
Mar 12, 2025
MINOR
This bill amends the Michigan liquor control code to clarify and standardize administrative fees for retailers who make dishonored payments to wholesalers. The changes remove formatting inconsistencies and restructure the fee schedule for clarity while maintaining the same penalty amounts for repeated bounced checks.
Scope change
No substantive change to the bill's scope or applicability; the amendment primarily addresses formatting and presentation of existing fee requirements.
TECHNICAL
Removed redundant line breaks and formatting artifacts from the original Senate introduction version.
Reorganized the administrative fee schedule to improve readability while keeping the same penalty amounts ($50-$250 for repeated dishonored payments).
Standardized capitalization and punctuation throughout the bill text for consistency.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 12, 2025
How they voted
36–1
Passed
Total votes 37
Mar 12, 2025
D
Democratic19
94% Yea
R
Republican18
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Mar 12, 2025
Committee
referred to Committee on Regulatory Reform
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Introduced
received on 03/12/2025
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED ROLL CALL # 20 YEAS 36 NAYS 0 EXCUSED 1 NOT VOTING 0
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 2/27/2025
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Introduced
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR ROGER HAUCK
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roger Hauck
RRepublican
Co
Jeremy Moss
DDemocratic
Co
Joe Bellino
RRepublican
Co
Paul Wojno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 88
Scope: MI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 88. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline