Residential-in-Commercial-Zone Laws - Study (Bring Back Main Street Act)
SB 829, the "Bring Back Main Street Act," requires certain Maryland counties to permit multifamily developments (buildings with five or more dwelling units sharing common walls) and mixed-use developments (residential plus non-residential uses where non-residential is under 50% of space and limited to first floors) as standard zoning. It prohibits counties from imposing restrictions on these developments, such as limiting height or density, while allowing counties to require a minimum percentage of retail space and on-site parking. The bill directly affects counties, developers, and communities by streamlining approval for housing projects that combine residential and commercial uses. This change aims to increase housing options in areas where such developments were previously restricted under local zoning rules.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 6, 2026
Signed May 26, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Third - Residential-in-Commercial-Zone Laws - Study (Bring Back Main Street Act)
→
Enrolled - Residential-in-Commercial-Zone Laws - Study (Bring Back Main Street Act)
·
4 edits
·
May 26, 2026
MODERATE
The bill transitioned from a draft Senate version to an enrolled, final version ready for the Governor's signature. The primary substantive change involves the repeal and reenactment of specific sections in the Maryland Code; the final version now includes amendments to Sections 1-401 and 10-103, whereas the draft version only proposed repealing and reenacting them without changes. Additionally, the final version adds new provisions to Sections 4-104(e) and 2-127, expanding the legislative text to include updated definitions and requirements for multifamily and mixed-use developments in commercial zones.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded by adding new sections to the Real Property and Land Use articles, while the applicability of existing charter county provisions was modified through amendments to the repeal and reenactment clauses.
REQUIREMENT
The repeal and reenactment of Article sections 1-401 and 10-103 was changed from 'without amendments' in the draft to 'with amendments' in the final version, indicating the law will be updated rather than simply restated.
New content was added to Section 4-104(e) of the Land Use article, introducing specific regulations or definitions related to multifamily and mixed-use developments.
DEFINITION
New content was added to Section 2-127 of the Real Property article, likely defining terms or establishing criteria for the new land use provisions.
TECHNICAL
The header and formatting were updated to reflect the bill's status as 'Enrolled' and to include spaces for the Governor's signature and the official chapter number.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 26, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 30, 2026
How they voted
48–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 49
Mar 26, 2026
D
Democratic36
100% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 26, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 725
executive
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Enrolled
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Introduced
Senate Concurs House Amendments
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Economic Matters
lower
Mar 30, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (103-33-6)
house of delegates
Mar 26, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (48-0-1)
senate
Mar 20, 2026
Committee
Referred Economic Matters
lower
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Education, Energy, and the Environment
upper
Feb 6, 2026
Committee
First Reading Education, Energy, and the Environment
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jeff Waldstreicher
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 829
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 829. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline