Business Regulation - Collection Agencies and Property Managers
SB 589 exempts property managers in Maryland from needing a separate license to collect rent, utilities, or fees for residential tenants. The bill specifically applies to property managers whose primary business is managing real property (not debt collection), and who collect payments only during a lease term or holdover period. This change removes a licensing requirement for these managers under Section 7-301 of Maryland's Business Regulation law, as long as debt collection isn't their main business activity. The exemption directly affects residential property management companies and individuals handling routine tenant payments. The bill amends Maryland law to clarify this exemption without creating new requirements.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
Last action Mar 24, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Business Regulation - Collection Agencies - Licensure Exemption for Property Managers
→
Third - Business Regulation - Collection Agencies and Property Managers
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to add a temporary enforcement exemption for property managers while a specific court case is pending, and to update the committee status and timeline information. The substantive policy content regarding property manager definitions and collection agency exemptions remains largely unchanged from the original version.
Scope change
The bill now includes a temporary exemption from Title 7 enforcement for property managers until a specific court case (Christine Smith v. Bozzuto Management Company) is resolved, which was not present in the original version.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new subsection (b) to Section 7-102 that prohibits enforcement of Title 7 of the Business Regulation Article against property managers until the resolution of case number C-15-CV-25-000340, Christine Smith v. Bozzuto Management Company.
TECHNICAL
Added committee report status showing the bill was favorably amended and adopted by the Senate on March 1, 2026.
Changed the bill title from 'Licensure Exemption for Property Managers' to 'Collection Agencies and Property Managers' to reflect the broader scope.
Added signature lines for Governor, President of the Senate, and Speaker of the House of Delegates at the end of the bill.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 3, 2026
How they voted
45–2
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 49
Mar 3, 2026
D
Democratic36
88% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 20, 2026
Committee
Referred Economic Matters
lower
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (45-2-2)
senate
Feb 5, 2026
Committee
First Reading Finance
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ben Kramer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 589
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 589. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline