State Highway Administration - Third-Party Road Improvements - Required Work Schedule
HB 669 prohibits political subdivisions (like counties or cities) from issuing use and occupancy permits to developers or contractors completing road work on State highways with over 25,000 average daily vehicles until the work is approved by both the State Highway Administration and the political subdivision. The bill amends Maryland law to require that all third-party road improvements on high-traffic state roads meet the satisfaction of both the State Highway Administration and the local political subdivision before permits are granted. Key mechanisms include requiring performance bonds for projects over $100,000, funded partly by private money, or located outside the applicant’s property. This directly affects developers and contractors performing road work on major state highways, ensuring completed improvements meet safety and quality standards before public use.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026
Last action Apr 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Political Subdivisions - Third-Party Road Improvements - Satisfactory Completion
→
Third - State Highway Administration - Third-Party Road Improvements - Required Work Schedule
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to expand its scope by adding a requirement for the State Highway Administration to enforce work schedules for third-party road improvements. This ensures that contractors complete projects on time and allows the state to revoke permits or seek damages if they fail to meet the schedule.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from focusing solely on satisfactory completion to also requiring adherence to a specific work schedule.
REQUIREMENT
Added a requirement for nongovernmental applicants to submit a work schedule to the State Highway Administration.
ENFORCEMENT
Added authority for the Administration to revoke permits if the work schedule is not followed.
Added liability for permit holders and their sureties for damages caused by failing to complete work according to the schedule.
TIMELINE
Added a requirement for the Administration to provide written notice before revoking a permit.
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 19, 2026
How they voted
135–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 142
Mar 19, 2026
D
Democratic103
96% Yea
R
Republican39
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Apr 9, 2026
Committee
Rereferred to Judicial Proceedings
upper
Apr 7, 2026
Committee
Referred Rules
upper
Apr 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 19, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (135-0-7)
house of delegates
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
First Reading Environment and Transportation
lower
6 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 669
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 669. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline