Motor Vehicles – Speed Monitoring Systems – Safety Corridors (Vulnerable Road User Protection Act of 2026)
HB 256, the "Vulnerable Road User Protection Act of 2026," authorizes Maryland’s State Highway Administration and local jurisdictions to install speed monitoring systems in designated "safety corridors" to protect pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users in high-risk areas. It amends traffic code provisions to create a new category for "safety corridor speed monitoring systems," requiring citations for violations to direct fines to the District Court (not local agencies) and mandating that collected funds support public safety programs like pedestrian safety initiatives. The bill specifies that local governments may recover implementation costs from fines but must use remaining funds exclusively for public safety, not general revenue. This directly affects drivers in safety corridor zones and local governments managing such systems.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Sep 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Sep 26, 2025
Last action Mar 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Motor Vehicles – Speed Monitoring Systems – Safety Corridors (Vulnerable Road User Protection Act of 2026)
→
Third - Motor Vehicles – Speed Monitoring Systems – Safety Corridors (Vulnerable Road User Protection Act of 2026)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to add a 'Committee Report: Favorable' and 'House action: Adopted' status, indicating it has passed committee review and been approved by the House. The substantive legal changes involve reorganizing which Maryland Code sections are being amended, shifting some provisions from the Transportation Article to the Insurance Article, and updating the list of traffic monitoring systems that trigger specific citation payment procedures.
Scope change
The bill's scope was modified by changing which sections of the Maryland Annotated Code are being amended, moving some provisions from the Transportation Article to the Insurance Article, and updating the list of monitoring systems that affect how citations are processed.
TIMELINE
Added 'Committee Report: Favorable' and 'House action: Adopted' to show the bill has progressed through legislative review.
ENFORCEMENT
Changed which sections of the Transportation and Insurance Articles are being amended, affecting how traffic violations and court costs are processed.
REQUIREMENT
Updated the list of monitoring systems (vehicle height, traffic signals, speed, work zone, stop sign, school bus, bus lane, noise abatement) that determine whether citation penalties go to political subdivisions or District Court.
TECHNICAL
Minor formatting changes to bill header information and code section references.
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 5, 2026
How they voted
101–33
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 142
Mar 5, 2026
D
Democratic103
95% Yea
R
Republican39
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 19, 2026
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 5, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (101-33-8)
house of delegates
Jan 14, 2026
Committee
First Reading Environment and Transportation
lower
Sep 26, 2025
Introduced
Pre-filed
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 256
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 256. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline