Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
SB 655 establishes a pilot program within Maryland's Administrative Office of the Courts to provide courts with expert analysis on the authenticity of electronic evidence potentially altered by artificial intelligence. The program will partner with academic institutions and technology professionals to develop expert witness resources, prioritizing civil cases where parties lack legal representation or access to such expertise. It requires the Administrative Office to issue a request for proposals (with preference for Maryland-based academic entities focused on AI) and authorizes $250,000 annually for fiscal years 2027-2028, limiting administrative costs to 20% of funds. The clinic aims to support fairer judicial outcomes in cases involving AI-generated evidence, directly affecting circuit and district courts handling civil matters.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Vetoed
May 2025
Introduced Jan 29, 2025
Vetoed May 16, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Third - Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
→
Enrolled - Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was finalized and prepared for the Governor's signature, adding standard enrolled bill formatting and signature lines. The substantive policy text regarding the AI Evidence Clinic Pilot Program remains unchanged, retaining the same funding amounts, eligibility criteria, and operational requirements as the previous version.
TECHNICAL
Added enrolled bill header, proofreader signature lines, and Governor/legislative signature blocks required for final passage.
Removed draft status indicators, committee report notes, and internal legislative tracking numbers.
Adjusted line numbering and spacing to conform to official enrolled bill formatting standards.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 24, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 25, 2025
How they voted
46–0
Passed
Total votes 46
Mar 24, 2025
D
Democratic33
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 16, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor (Policy)
executive
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed Enrolled
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Introduced
Senate Concurs House Amendments
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 25, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (132-5-2)
house of delegates
Mar 24, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (46-0)
senate
Mar 13, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Katie Hester
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 655
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 655. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline