Prince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 210
SB 485 increases civil penalties for speeding violations recorded by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 210 (Piscataway Highway) in Prince George’s County. It sets specific fines based on how much a driver exceeds the speed limit: $60 for 12-15 mph over, $80 for 16-19 mph over, $140 for 20-29 mph over, $270 for 30-39 mph over, and $500 for 40+ mph over. The bill repeals a previous sunset provision that would have ended the speed monitoring program on this route after 2028, making it permanent. This directly affects drivers who exceed speed limits on this specific highway segment without receiving an officer-cited ticket.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Mar 28, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Prince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 210
→
Third - Prince George's County - Speed Monitoring Systems - Maryland Route 210
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill amends existing speed monitoring penalty laws in Prince George's County to increase the maximum fines for speeding violations recorded by cameras. The changes adjust penalty amounts based on how much the speed limit is exceeded, while also clarifying the bill's purpose and maintaining the sunset provision for the speed monitoring authority.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on Prince George's County and Maryland Route 210, but the penalty amounts for speeding violations have been increased.
ENFORCEMENT
Increased maximum civil penalties for speeding violations recorded by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 210, with specific adjustments for different speed excess ranges (e.g., $40 to $70 for 16-19 mph over, $120 to $140 for 20-29 mph over, $230 to $270 for 30-39 mph over, and $425 to $500 for 40+ mph over).
TECHNICAL
Added bill status information including committee report status, Senate adoption, and second reading date.
Reorganized the bill text structure and renumbered sections, moving the sunset provision (Section 3) to appear before the effective date provision (Section 2).
Floor votes · Senate Mar 9, 2025
How they voted
35–7
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 46
Mar 9, 2025
D
Democratic33
90% Yea
R
Republican13
53% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred Rules and Executive Nominations
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 9, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-7-4)
senate
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Muse
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 485
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 485. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline