Criminal Law - Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable and Senior Adults
SB 466 prohibits caregivers, family members, or household members from knowingly taking property from vulnerable or senior adults with the intent to deprive them of it. The bill makes such exploitation a violation of Maryland’s Consumer Protection Act, allowing the Attorney General’s Senior and Vulnerable Adult Asset Recovery Unit to pursue civil cases for asset recovery. It also disqualifies convicted individuals from inheriting or benefiting from the victim’s estate, insurance, or property. This law directly protects vulnerable seniors and their families while strengthening enforcement through existing consumer protection and criminal justice mechanisms.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2025
Last action Mar 19, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Vulnerable and Senior Adults - Theft of Property by Caregiver, Family Member, or Household Member - Prohibition
→
Third - Criminal Law - Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable and Senior Adults
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to rename the legislation from 'Theft of Property by Caregiver, Family Member, or Household Member' to 'Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable and Senior Adults,' broadening the scope to include broader financial exploitation scenarios beyond just theft. The bill also added co-sponsors to the legislation and updated the committee status to show favorable action with amendments.
Scope change
The bill's scope was broadened from specifically prohibiting theft by caregivers to addressing general financial exploitation of vulnerable and senior adults, potentially covering a wider range of abusive financial behaviors.
SCOPE
Bill title changed from 'Theft of Property by Caregiver, Family Member, or Household Member' to 'Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable and Senior Adults' to encompass broader financial exploitation scenarios.
ELIGIBILITY
Added co-sponsors (Senators Smith, Waldstreicher, Sydnor, Muse, Love, Charles, James, West, and Folden) to the bill sponsorship list.
ENFORCEMENT
Updated bill status to show 'Committee Report: Favorable with amendments' and 'Senate action: Adopted' indicating legislative progress.
TECHNICAL
Changed document reference from 'CF 5lr2636' to 'CF HB 604' and updated introduction date to January 21, 2025.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 28, 2025
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 46
Feb 28, 2025
D
Democratic33
90% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (43-0-3)
senate
Jan 22, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings and Education, Energy, and the Environment
upper
9 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 466
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 466. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline