Confined Aquatic Disposal Cells - Construction - Moratorium
SB 168 prohibits Maryland’s Department of the Environment and Board of Public Works from processing or approving applications to construct confined aquatic disposal cells (underwater containment structures for contaminated sediments) within a certain distance of "overburdened communities." These communities are defined as census tracts where three or more environmental health indicators - such as high pollution levels, proximity to hazardous sites, or elevated asthma rates - exceed statewide 75th percentile thresholds. The bill directly affects developers seeking to build such disposal cells near these communities and state agencies responsible for environmental approvals. It replaces existing provisions to implement this moratorium, focusing on preventing new disposal projects in areas already facing environmental health burdens.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Oct 2024
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Vetoed
May 2025
Introduced Oct 27, 2024
Vetoed May 16, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Environmental Justice in Confined Aquatic Disposal Act
→
Third - Confined Aquatic Disposal Cells - Construction - Moratorium
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to add a moratorium on constructing confined aquatic disposal cells near residential overburdened communities during a specific time period. The definition of 'confined aquatic disposal cell' was expanded to include specific construction requirements, and the bill now includes new committee and adoption status information.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed to focus on a moratorium for confined aquatic disposal cell construction near overburdened communities, while maintaining the existing definitions and restrictions on dredged material redeposition.
SCOPE
Added a moratorium provision prohibiting construction of confined aquatic disposal cells near residential overburdened communities during a certain time period.
DEFINITION
Expanded the definition of 'confined aquatic disposal cell' to include specific requirements about dredged material management and beneficial reuse.
TIMELINE
Added committee report status showing favorable with amendments and Senate adoption on February 22, 2025.
TECHNICAL
Changed the bill title format from 'AN ACT concerning' to 'CHAPTER ______' and reorganized the bill structure.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 23, 2025 · House of Delegates Mar 25, 2025
How they voted
46–0
Passed
Total votes 46
Feb 23, 2025
D
Democratic33
100% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
6
May 16, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor (Policy)
executive
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted
lower
Apr 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 25, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (137-0-2)
house of delegates
Mar 14, 2025
Committee
Referred Environment and Transportation
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Education, Energy, and the Environment
upper
Feb 23, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (46-0)
senate
Jan 8, 2025
Committee
First Reading Education, Energy, and the Environment
upper
Oct 27, 2024
Introduced
Pre-filed
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bryan Simonaire
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 168
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 168. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline