Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
HB 966 establishes a two-year pilot program within Maryland's Administrative Office of the Courts to provide courts with AI evidence expertise. The program will select a Maryland-based academic or tech entity (prioritizing those with AI experience and academic focus) through a request for proposals to develop expert resources for civil cases where parties lack legal representation or access to AI experts. It authorizes up to $250,000 in annual funding for 2027-2028, with no more than 20% for administrative costs, and includes liability protections for the selected entity (excluding cases of serious negligence). This directly affects circuit and district courts handling civil cases involving potential AI-altered evidence, particularly benefiting unrepresented individuals. The program aims to create a practical resource for courts navigating AI-related evidence without creating new legal standards.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 31, 2025
Last action Apr 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
→
Third - Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill was amended to shift the program's funding mechanism from a direct contract with a single entity to a grant-based system awarded to multiple institutions of higher education. The changes also add a new step requiring the Administrative Office of the Courts to develop a grant application before awarding funds, and include a minor typo correction in the indemnification clause.
Scope change
The program's scope expanded from a single managed entity to multiple eligible institutions of higher education receiving grants, broadening participation in the Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program.
FISCAL
Changed the funding mechanism from selecting one entity to manage the program to awarding grants to multiple eligible institutions of higher education.
REQUIREMENT
Added a requirement for the Administrative Office of the Courts to develop a grant application for the program before awarding grants.
TECHNICAL
Corrected a typo in Section 2(F) where 'THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT' was changed to 'THE TERMS OF THE AN AGREEMENT' and added 'GRANTEE' references to clarify the indemnification clause.
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 19, 2025
How they voted
128–9
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 140
Mar 19, 2025
D
Democratic101
97% Yea
R
Republican39
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Apr 3, 2025
Committee
Referred Rules
upper
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 19, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (128-9-3)
house of delegates
Jan 31, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judiciary
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jon Cardin
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 966
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 966. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline