Criminal Procedure - Expungement - No Finding and Case Terminated Without Finding
HB 610 expands expungement eligibility in Maryland by allowing certain criminal charges to be cleared from records when dismissed without a conviction. Specifically, it adds that charges may be expunged if the court issued a "no finding" or terminated the case without a finding - rather than resulting in a conviction. This applies to charges already listed as eligible under current law (such as specific misdemeanors and felonies), without changing the list of offenses. The bill does not alter existing eligibility criteria but broadens the circumstances under which expungement is possible for dismissed cases.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action Mar 17, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Criminal Procedure - Expungement - No Finding and Case Terminated Without Finding
→
Third - Criminal Procedure - Expungement - No Finding and Case Terminated Without Finding
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill update adds administrative tracking information (Committee Report and House action dates) and reorganizes the bill's formatting. The core expungement eligibility criteria remain unchanged, though line numbering was adjusted to reflect the new structure.
Scope change
No substantive change to the bill's scope or applicability; changes are primarily administrative and formatting-related.
TECHNICAL
Added 'Committee Report: Favorable' and 'House action: Adopted' with a second reading date of March 2, 2025, to track legislative progress.
Reformatted the bill title section, changing 'A BILL ENTITLED' to 'CHAPTER ______' to prepare for official publication.
Reordered and renumbered the list of eligible offenses for expungement to align with new formatting standards, though the actual offenses listed remain identical.
Added explanatory notes about formatting conventions (capitalization, brackets, underlining, and strike-through text) to help readers understand the document markup.
Floor votes · House of Delegates Mar 3, 2025
How they voted
132–5
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 139
Mar 3, 2025
D
Democratic100
99% Yea
R
Republican39
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Mar 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 3, 2025
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (132-5-2)
house of delegates
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
First Reading Judiciary
lower
16 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Charlotte Crutchfield
DDemocratic
P
Diana Fennell
DDemocratic
P
Frank Conaway
DDemocratic
P
Jackie Addison
DDemocratic
P
Jamila Woods
DDemocratic
P
Jared Solomon
DDemocratic
P
Jheanelle Wilkins
DDemocratic
P
Karen Simpson
DDemocratic
P
Kris Valderrama
DDemocratic
P
Kym Taylor
DDemocratic
P
Malcolm Ruff
DDemocratic
P
Mark Edelson
DDemocratic
P
Mary Lehman
DDemocratic
P
Melissa Wells
DDemocratic
P
Scott Phillips
DDemocratic
P
Veronica Turner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 610
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 610. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline