Home Maine Elections 2022 Jared Golden

Jared Golden

Democratic candidate · 2022 general election · Maine

JG

Jared Golden

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$6,068,685
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$4,816,687
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$736,674
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$6,164,856
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$34,690
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $6,068,685 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$4,816,68779.4%
PAC and other committee contributions$736,67412.1%
Party committee contributions$10,0000.2%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$505,3248.3%
Total receipts$6,068,685100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$34,690
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$81,568
Contributions refunded to committees$0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$484,525
Transfers made to other authorized committees$0
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$5,481,793Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$81,568Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00653816, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00653816
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$83,698$34,690Down $49,008
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$8,857$1,017Down $7,840

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $34,690 set beside the $57,094 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 0.6 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Jared Golden. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$3,624,242
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$5,178,199
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $6,012,442 of itemized spending across 1,451 transactions, through Dec 31, 2022. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 97.5% of the $6,164,856 in total disbursements reported for the 2022 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

The difference between that subtotal and total disbursements is spending reported without itemization, which cannot be categorized.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising and media $3,920,67665.2%91
Administration, salary, and overhead $883,96414.7%777
Fundraising and solicitation $635,13710.6%62
Legal, accounting, and compliance $204,7173.4%54
Polling and research $111,2491.9%9
Technology and digital services $66,8651.1%106
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $64,2521.1%88
Campaign materials $49,8590.8%24
Travel $49,3170.8%182
Events $26,4050.4%58
Classified$5,948,18998.9%
Unclassified filing descriptions$64,2521.1%
Itemized spending categorized here$6,012,442100%1,451

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 208 shown $751,268 total · $66,110 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA C00271338$25,4003.4%8Sep 29, 2022
2END CITIZENS UNITED C00573261$10,4401.4%14Sep 28, 2022
3DCCC C00000935$10,2701.4%11Nov 2, 2022
4CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS C00001016$10,0001.3%2Oct 19, 2022
5MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS C00002469$10,0001.3%2Jun 30, 2022
Show the complete list of 208 committees →

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Jared Golden

Top 5 of 7 shown $3,624,242 total · $3,573,106 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending supporting this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1DCCC C00000935$1,789,11149.4%17Oct 28, 2022
2THE MODERATE PAC, INC. C00790089$749,16020.7%9Oct 31, 2022
3WITH HONOR FUND, INC. C00659011$458,59312.7%9Oct 31, 2022
4End Citizens United C00573261$388,40710.7%2Oct 18, 2022
5AMERICAN VETERANS SUPPORT GROUP PAC C00771865$187,8355.2%386Oct 27, 2022
Show the complete list of 7 committees →

Opposing Jared Golden

1 organization shown $5,178,199 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending opposing this candidate
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1NRCC C00075820$5,178,199100.0%17Nov 1, 2022

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Jared Golden and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Jared Golden

Independent spending supporting this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $2,322,01264.1%20
Broadcast, cable, and radio advertising $493,77613.6%5
Canvassing and field organizing $307,1048.5%3
Digital and online advertising $230,5996.4%6
Phone calls and text messages $143,4194.0%274
Direct mail $44,8191.2%4
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported description could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $44,4161.2%112
Polling and research $31,2000.9%1
Printed materials and signs $6,8970.2%2
Classified$3,579,82698.8%
Unclassified filing descriptions$44,4161.2%
Total independent spending$3,624,242100%427

Opposing Jared Golden

Independent spending opposing this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Advertising, medium not specified Reported as a media buy or as advertising, with no medium named. $5,178,199100.0%17
Classified$5,178,199100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$00.0%
Total independent spending$5,178,199100%17

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Joint fundraising committees

A joint fundraising committee raises money for several campaigns at once and passes each participant its share. The amounts below are what each committee reported transferring to this campaign. The underlying contributions were made by individuals and committees to the joint effort, so a transfer is jointly raised money arriving, not a committee funding Jared Golden.

1 organization shown $8,400 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Joint fundraising committees ranked by the amount they reported transferring
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1FORMIDABLE FIVE VICTORY FUND C00801613$8,400100.0%1Mar 31, 2022

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Jared Golden

Committees itemized $751,268 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs $257,00034.2%69135
Non-connected committees $116,56415.5%3076
Labor union PACs $111,50014.8%2034
Other candidates' committees $91,00112.1%4369
Membership organization PACs $74,93310.0%1631
Trade association PACs $69,0009.2%2231
Cooperative PACs $14,0001.9%45
Party committees $10,2701.4%111
Corporate PACs $7,0000.9%33
Itemized total for this direction$751,268

Spent supporting Jared Golden

Committees itemized $3,624,242 in independent spending supporting Jared Golden.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Non-connected committees $1,835,13150.6%6410
Party committees $1,789,11149.4%117
Itemized total for this direction$3,624,242

Spent opposing Jared Golden

Committees itemized $5,178,199 in independent spending opposing Jared Golden.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Party committees $5,178,199100.0%117
Itemized total for this direction$5,178,199

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Jared Golden

Committees itemized $751,268 in contributions to this campaign. $358,271 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $392,997, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $259,840 and committees not yet categorized account for $133,157.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Public sector unions Labor $41,00010.4%715
Building trades unions Labor $25,0006.4%35
Industrial unions Labor $20,0005.1%35
Food and beverage Agriculture $17,0004.3%35
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $16,5004.2%36
Transportation unions Labor $16,5004.2%57
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $12,5003.2%23
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $10,9002.8%24
Agribusiness Agriculture $10,5002.7%88
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue $10,4402.7%114
Physicians and medical specialties Health $10,0002.5%23
Veterans Ideological and single-issue $10,0002.5%14
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $7,5001.9%13
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $7,5001.9%12
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate $7,0001.8%22
Air transport Transportation $6,0001.5%13
LGBTQ rights Ideological and single-issue $6,0001.5%15
Media and entertainment Communications and technology $5,0001.3%23
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $5,0001.3%11
Telecommunications Communications and technology $5,0001.3%11
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $3,5000.9%12
Accounting Professional services $2,5000.6%11
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $2,5000.6%11
Automotive Transportation $1,0000.3%11
Construction Construction $1,0000.3%11
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $358,271Not applicable113215
Committees not yet categorized $133,15733.9%4075
Base the shares are taken over$392,997100%
Itemized total for this direction$751,268

Spent supporting Jared Golden

Committees itemized $3,624,242 in independent spending supporting Jared Golden. $1,789,111 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $1,835,131, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $439,539 and committees not yet categorized account for $1,395,593.

Independent spenders supporting this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Democracy and election reform Ideological and single-issue $388,40721.2%12
Veterans Ideological and single-issue $51,1322.8%13
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $1,789,111Not applicable117
Committees not yet categorized $1,395,59376.0%4405
Base the shares are taken over$1,835,131100%
Itemized total for this direction$3,624,242

Spent opposing Jared Golden

Committees itemized $5,178,199 in independent spending opposing Jared Golden. $5,178,199 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $0, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $0 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over.$5,178,199Not applicable117
Base the shares are taken over$0100%
Itemized total for this direction$5,178,199

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$286,953
Across 20 notices, received May 8, 2022 to Nov 4, 2022

Still only provisional

$18,505
1 notice no stored regular report covers yet

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 6, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Jared Golden's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 6, 2022$17,2009Nov 4 to Nov 4, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 5, 2022$3,5002Nov 3 to Nov 3, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 4, 2022$18,50510Oct 19 to Nov 2, 2022ProvisionalFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$20,48011Nov 1 to Nov 1, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 2, 2022$25,90014Oct 31 to Oct 31, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 31, 2022$2,0001Oct 29 to Oct 29, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 30, 2022$21,90013Oct 28 to Oct 28, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 29, 2022$4,7263Oct 27 to Oct 27, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 28, 2022$19,30010Oct 26 to Oct 26, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 27, 2022$24,90011Oct 25 to Oct 25, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

The 10 most recent notices of 20 are listed. The amount and count above cover all of them.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $3,709,302 of the $5,301,212 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 11,556 itemized contributions.

From Maine

$947,822
25.6% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$2,761,480
74.4% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Maine is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$3,706,11211,55499.9%
Addresses outside the United StatesContributors who gave an address abroad. United States citizens living overseas may contribute, and this figure is not evidence that anyone gave unlawfully.$3,19020.1%

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 50 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Maine this campaign's state $947,822
  • California $525,132
  • Massachusetts $518,035
  • New York $515,264
  • Texas $154,043
  • Florida $148,564
  • District of Columbia $119,208
  • Illinois $109,703
  • Connecticut $73,750
  • Maryland $73,421
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Maine this campaign's state$947,8225,91425.6%
California$525,13299214.2%
Massachusetts$518,0351,10514.0%
New York$515,26472613.9%
Texas$154,0432014.2%
Florida$148,5642114.0%
District of Columbia$119,2082403.2%
Illinois$109,7032533.0%
Connecticut$73,7501482.0%
Maryland$73,4211812.0%
Virginia$57,3271251.5%
New Jersey$51,9061081.4%
Colorado$38,304801.0%
Washington$37,3201361.0%
Pennsylvania$32,2191260.9%
Georgia$29,328560.8%
Oregon$29,271900.8%
Arizona$27,931500.8%
Missouri$24,808420.7%
Minnesota$23,737620.6%
New Hampshire$20,795470.6%
Wisconsin$15,086250.4%
Utah$14,230560.4%
Kentucky$14,085270.4%
Michigan$13,080440.4%
Vermont$9,909390.3%
New Mexico$9,300210.3%
Oklahoma$8,87550.2%
Rhode Island$8,219190.2%
Idaho$7,633240.2%
Ohio$5,5931030.2%
South Carolina$5,268330.1%
Tennessee$4,911140.1%
Nevada$4,172210.1%
Louisiana$3,867110.1%
North Carolina$3,738890.1%
Indiana$3,492240.1%
Foreign countries$3,19020.1%
South Dakota$3,11180.1%
Arkansas$3,10060.1%
Alaska$2,58960.1%
Iowa$1,45215<0.1%
Kansas$1,41523<0.1%
Hawaii$1,0758<0.1%
Delaware$1,0257<0.1%
Nebraska$8344<0.1%
Mississippi$7056<0.1%
West Virginia$68511<0.1%
Alabama$50010<0.1%
Wyoming$2752<0.1%
Reported with a place$3,709,30211,556100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle: 6 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $6,068,685
  • Cohort median $515,335
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$6,068,685
Lowest in the cohort-$22
25th percentile$0
Median$515,335
75th percentile$3,671,940
Highest in the cohort$6,068,685
Campaigns counted6

5 of the 6 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 83th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 12.1%
  • Cohort median 12.1%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign12.1%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile5.5%
Median12.1%
75th percentile24.4%
Highest in the cohort49.4%
Campaigns counted5

2 of the 5 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 40th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $34,690
  • Cohort median $21,752
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$34,690
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$21,752
75th percentile$105,777
Highest in the cohort$404,275
Campaigns counted6

3 of the 6 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 50th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $3,624,242
  • Cohort median $2
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$3,624,242
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$2
75th percentile$22,292
Highest in the cohort$3,624,242
Campaigns counted6

5 of the 6 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 83th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $5,178,199
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Maine, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$5,178,199
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$5,178,199
Highest in the cohort$6,852,176
Campaigns counted6

4 of the 6 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 67th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.