Joint Order, Propounding A Question To The Supreme Judicial Court Regarding The Use Of Ranked-Choice Voting In Elections Requiring A Plurality Of Votes
This joint order asks the Maine Supreme Judicial Court to issue an advisory opinion on whether ranked-choice voting complies with the state constitution's requirement that certain officials be elected by a plurality of votes. The request is prompted by recent legislation, L.D. 1666, which seeks to restore ranked-choice voting for general elections for Governor, State Senator, and State Representative after voters previously removed these offices from the system via a veto. The Legislature seeks clarification before the 2026 election cycle begins to prevent potential legal challenges that could delay the seating of elected officials or create confusion on ballots containing two different voting methods. If the Court finds the current method unconstitutional, the Legislature may need to propose constitutional amendments for voter approval.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2026
Last action Feb 10, 2026
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
2
Committee
0
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Subsequently, the Joint Order was PASSED.
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
On motion by Senator RENY of Lincoln READ and PASSED
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cameron Reny
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SP 900
Scope: ME
Hi! I can help you understand SP 900. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline