COURTS: Constitutional amendment to provide for jurisdiction of the Louisiana Supreme Court. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))
SB 68 proposes a constitutional amendment to give the Louisiana Supreme Court exclusive authority to discipline lawyers not licensed in Louisiana who practice law or offer legal services within the state. This specifically affects out-of-state attorneys who are "specially admitted," "not admitted," "licensed in another state," or "own a law firm" in Louisiana, including those with supervisory roles over local lawyers. The amendment would revise Article V, Section 5(B) of the state constitution to clarify this jurisdiction and requires voter approval at the April 2027 election. The bill does not change existing disciplinary rules for Louisiana-licensed attorneys.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Signed May 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB68 Original
→
SB68 Act 38
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill was finalized into an enrolled act, adding official signatures from the Senate and House leaders. The core policy text regarding the constitutional amendment to allow the Louisiana Supreme Court to discipline out-of-state lawyers remains unchanged. The primary difference is the addition of formal leadership signatures required for the bill to become law.
Scope change
The bill's substantive scope regarding attorney discipline jurisdiction is unchanged; the change is purely procedural, adding official signatures to finalize the document.
TECHNICAL
Added the title 'ACT No. 38' and the signatures of the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives to finalize the bill as law.
Removed the 'ORIGINAL' designation and the Senate Legislative Services digest section, which are no longer needed once the bill is enacted.
Updated the page header from 'ORIGINAL' to 'ENROLLED' to reflect the bill's final status.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 24, 2026 · House Apr 28, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Mar 24, 2026
D
Democratic12
83% Yea
R
Republican28
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendments proposed by the House read and concurred in by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays.
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 92, nays 0. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (6-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
Mar 25, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays, and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jay Morris
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 68
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 68. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline