ELECTION OFFENSES: Provides for disclosures required in certain digital political communications
HB 540 requires clear disclosures in digital political ads during elections. It applies to candidates, their committees, and groups paying for online election content. The bill mandates specific wording based on authorization: if paid by a candidate's committee, it must state "paid for by [full committee name]"; if paid by others but authorized, it must name the payer and authorizer; if unaffiliated, it must list the payer's full name, physical address, phone, and website. These rules mirror existing print disclosure requirements but extend them to digital platforms.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
Signed Jun 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB540 Original
→
HB540 Act 652
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the legal definition of 'electioneering communication' to explicitly include digital materials, such as online ads and social media posts, alongside traditional broadcast media. By aligning the disclosure rules for digital content with those for broadcast content, the law now requires online political ads to clearly state who paid for them and whether they are authorized by a candidate. This change closes a regulatory gap, ensuring that voters receive the same transparency regarding political spending regardless of whether the ad appears on television or the internet.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of the law from covering only broadcast communications (TV, radio, cable) to also covering digital communications, including websites, web applications, and social media platforms.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'electioneering communication' was updated to include digital materials that refer to a legally qualified candidate and are broadcast within 60 days before an election.
The previous definition of 'digital material' as a standalone category was removed because it is now subsumed under the broader 'electioneering communication' definition.
REQUIREMENT
New requirements mandate that digital political communications must display the same disclosure information as broadcast ads, including the full name of the payer and authorization status.
ELIGIBILITY
The applicability of disclosure rules was extended to include online political advertisements that were previously not explicitly covered under the electioneering communication statute.
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2026 · House Apr 9, 2026
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2026
D
Democratic12
83% Yea
R
Republican28
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
4
Committee
5
May 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 21, 2026
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 95, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (13-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on House and Governmental Affairs.
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on House and Governmental Affairs.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alonzo Knox
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 540
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 540. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline