COURTS/JUVENILE: Provides relative to the judicial expense fund for the Juvenile Court for the parish of East Baton Rouge
HB 538 creates a dedicated judicial expense fund for East Baton Rouge Parish's Juvenile Court by increasing civil filing fees (up to $75) and adding $10 in criminal nonsupport cases. The fund can cover court staff salaries, equipment, operational costs, and library expenses, but explicitly prohibits using it to pay judges' salaries. All fund disbursements require oversight by the court's chief judge and judges sitting en banc, with annual audits filed publicly. This bill directly affects the financial administration of juvenile court proceedings in East Baton Rouge Parish.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 26, 2026
Signed Jun 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB538 Original
→
HB538 Act 928
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the rules for the Juvenile Court in East Baton Rouge Parish by increasing the maximum fee judges can set for civil cases from $15 to $45 and raising the fee for criminal nonsupport cases from $10 to $15. It also shifts administrative control of the court's expense fund from the single chief judge to the full panel of judges sitting together, ensuring broader oversight. Additionally, the bill clarifies that no judge's personal salary can be paid from this fund, reinforcing that the money is strictly for court operations.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains limited to the Juvenile Court of East Baton Rouge Parish, but the authority to set fees and manage funds has been expanded from a single chief judge to the entire judicial panel.
FISCAL
Increased the maximum additional civil filing fee from $15 to $45 and the criminal nonsupport fee from $10 to $15.
REQUIREMENT
Changed control of the judicial expense fund from the chief judge alone to the judges sitting en banc (the full panel of judges).
Explicitly prohibited the payment of any judge's personal salary from the judicial expense fund.
Corrected grammatical errors and clarified the text regarding the appointment of staff and the use of funds for equipment and library costs.
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2026 · House Apr 15, 2026
How they voted
32–1
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 40
May 19, 2026
D
Democratic12
83% Yea
R
Republican28
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
5
Committee
5
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read by title, roll called, yeas 93, nays 4. The Senate amendments, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, were concurred in.
lower
May 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title, passed by a vote of 32 yeas and 1 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 6, 2026
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Reported favorably.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 83, nays 12. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (10-0).
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Barbara Freiberg
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 538
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 538. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline