LOCAL OFFL/POLICE CHIEFS: Provides relative to the police chief of the village of Tickfaw
HB 326 requires the police chief of Tickfaw, Louisiana, to reside within the village's corporate limits and have lived there for at least one year prior to running for office. It amends local law to mandate this residency requirement for candidates seeking the position, overriding any previous qualifications. The bill directly affects individuals running for police chief in Tickfaw by adding these location-based eligibility rules. This is a procedural change specific to Tickfaw's local government structure.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Feb 24, 2026
Signed Jun 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB326 Original
→
HB326 Act 638
·
4 edits
MODERATE
HB 326 was enacted as Act 638, converting the bill from a draft proposal into official law. The primary substantive change is the creation of a specific exception for the Village of Tickfaw, requiring its police chief to reside within the village's corporate limits rather than just the parish, and mandating that candidates be domiciled there for one year prior to qualifying.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by adding a specific exception for the Village of Tickfaw, distinguishing it from other municipalities under the same statute.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new requirement for the Village of Tickfaw that its elected police chief must reside within the village's corporate limits.
Added a new requirement that candidates for the Village of Tickfaw police chief must have been domiciled in the village for the year preceding their qualification.
ELIGIBILITY
Modified the general eligibility rules for police chiefs by creating a specific carve-out for the Village of Tickfaw, overriding the standard parish-wide residency requirement.
TECHNICAL
Updated document formatting to reflect the bill's status as an enrolled Act (Act No. 638) with signatures from the Speaker, Senate President, and Governor.
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2026 · House May 7, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 25, 2026
D
Democratic12
91% Yea
R
Republican28
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
4
Committee
4
May 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 36 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 19, 2026
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 91, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (14-0).
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Municipal, Parochial and Cultural Affairs.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nicholas Muscarello
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 326
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 326. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline