RETIREMENT BENEFITS: Establishes an exception to suspension of retirement benefits for court reporters who are reemployed by judicial districts or parishes where a critical shortage exists. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE FC SG EX)
SB 6 allows court reporters in Louisiana to keep their retirement benefits if rehired by a judicial district or parish facing a critical shortage of qualified court reporters. It requires the chief judge to certify the shortage and advertise the need for 30 days in the official journal, plus post notices at designated offices, before rehiring. The bill also clarifies that employers must continue making retirement contributions as specified under existing law. This directly affects court reporters and judicial employers in areas with staffing shortages.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Feb 28, 2025
Signed Jun 4, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB6 Original
→
SB6 Act
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill converts a draft proposal into an official enrolled act, changing the document status from 'Original' to 'Enrolled' and assigning it Act No. 22. Substantively, it amends the law governing court reporter reemployment by requiring employers to post job vacancy notices at the Louisiana Workforce Commission's career development office in addition to existing publication requirements. It also clarifies that the chief judge, rather than the employer broadly, must certify the critical shortage of qualified court reporters to the retirement system.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on the Parochial Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and court reporters, but the specific procedural requirements for hiring have been expanded to include mandatory posting at state workforce offices.
REQUIREMENT
Added a requirement for employers to post notices of critical shortages and job openings at the Louisiana Workforce Commission's career development office or similar entities.
Changed the certification authority for critical shortages from the 'employer' to the 'chief judge' of the employer.
TECHNICAL
Updated document headers and footers to reflect the bill's transition from a draft version to an enrolled, signed act.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 28, 2025 · House May 27, 2025
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Apr 28, 2025
D
Democratic11
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
May 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 96, nays 0. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 19, 2025
Introduced
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
lower
May 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably (10-0). Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Retirement.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read by title, passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays, and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
Apr 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported with amendments.
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Retirement.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Abraham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 6
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 6. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline