ENERGY: Provides relative to carbon dioxide sequestration (EG INCREASE SD EX See Note)
HB 696 requires operators of carbon dioxide storage facilities to ensure specific fire departments have necessary emergency equipment before CO2 injection begins. It directly affects operators of CO2 storage facilities and fire departments in parishes with transmission pipelines or jurisdiction over storage sites. Key provisions mandate operators provide missing personal protective equipment identified during pre-injection training exercises. The bill focuses on emergency preparedness for CO2 storage operations, not on carbon policy or sequestration methods. (Note: The bill's amendments primarily renumbered or deleted sections, with Amendment 9 adding the fire department requirements.)
Bill status
in committee
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Failed
May 2025
Governor
Introduced May 21, 2025
Last action Jun 2, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB696 Original
→
HB696 Engrossed
·
2 edits
·
May 22, 2025
MINOR
The bill text was updated from its original version to the engrossed version, reflecting final passage by the legislature. The changes consist entirely of formatting adjustments, such as updating the status label from 'ORIGINAL' to 'ENGROSSED' and correcting minor spacing inconsistencies in the header. No substantive policy changes, new definitions, funding amounts, or legal requirements were added or removed.
TECHNICAL
Updated the document status label from 'ORIGINAL' to 'ENGROSSED' to indicate the bill has been passed in its final form.
Adjusted spacing and alignment in the header section to standardize the layout of the bill title and status.
Floor votes · House May 29, 2025
How they voted
45–39
Failed · 18 other
Total votes 102
May 29, 2025
D
Democratic31
48% Nay
R
Republican71
54% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
1
Committee
1
May 29, 2025
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (45-39-18)
house
May 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read by title, substitute title adopted, lies over in the same order of business, substitute for HB No. 353 reported by the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment (15-0).
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Shane Mack
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 696
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 696. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline