PETROLEUM/OIL-GAS: Provides for common carriers of petroleum pipelines
Based on the bill title, HB 494 aims to establish regulations or provisions for petroleum pipelines to operate as "common carriers." This means pipelines would be required to transport petroleum for any company or individual willing to pay a standard fee, similar to how common carriers operate in other industries. The bill would primarily affect companies that own and operate petroleum pipelines, as well as businesses that rely on these pipelines for transporting oil and gas products. However, the provided text only includes amendments and not the full bill, so specific details on its mechanisms are not available.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Apr 4, 2025
Last action May 21, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB494 Reengrossed
→
HB494 Engrossed
·
4 edits
·
May 19, 2025
MODERATE
This bill updates the official status of HB 494 from 'Reengrossed' to 'Engrossed' and clarifies the definition of regulated facilities. The primary substantive change is the addition of a provision stating that the law applies retroactively to a specific pending legal case (Cantium, LLC v. Rosefield Fourchon Operating, LLC), ensuring the new rules cover past disputes involving tank facilities.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding the Cantium, LLC case was expanded to include retrospective application, whereas the previous version explicitly excluded retroactive application to that matter.
TIMELINE
Added a clause making the law retroactively applicable to the Cantium, LLC v. Rosefield Fourchon Operating, LLC case and related appeals.
Removed the previous clause that explicitly stated the law would not apply retroactively to the Cantium, LLC case.
DEFINITION
Adjusted the text defining 'pipe line' to remove redundant words and improve clarity regarding integral facilities.
TECHNICAL
Updated document headers and footers to reflect the bill's transition from 'Reengrossed' to 'Engrossed' status.
Floor votes · House May 19, 2025
How they voted
66–25
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 102
May 19, 2025
D
Democratic31
61% Nay
R
Republican71
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
2
Committee
3
May 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 68, nays 26. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (12-6).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.
lower
Apr 4, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Commerce.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jessica Domangue
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 494
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 494. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline