COURTS/COURT COSTS: Provides relative to deferral of costs and fees associated with electronic filing requirements (EN NO IMPACT See Note)
HB 123 allows courts to defer costs and fees related to electronic filing systems. It specifically clarifies that courts can delay payments for these fees when using third-party vendors, not just direct court clerks. The bill modifies existing rules to include third-party vendors in the deferral process for electronic filing costs. This change directly affects courts and electronic filing service providers handling court documents.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
Jun 2025
Introduced Mar 25, 2025
Signed Jun 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB123 Original
→
HB123 Act
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill updates the definition of 'court costs' to include fees charged by third-party vendors for electronic filing, not just those charged directly by clerks. It also extends the deferral period for government entities to pay these costs until a judgment is final or all issues are adjudicated, removing a previous 30-day payment deadline.
Scope change
The scope of 'court costs' was expanded to include third-party vendor fees, and the applicability of the deferral rule was broadened to cover all pending issues in a case rather than just the initial judgment date.
DEFINITION
Expanded the definition of 'court costs' to include fees charged by third-party vendors for electronic filing, in addition to fees charged by clerks.
TIMELINE
Removed the 30-day deadline for government entities to pay deferred court costs; costs are now only due after the judgment becomes final or all issues are adjudicated.
REQUIREMENT
Updated the requirement for withholding costs to apply until the judgment is final or all issues in the judicial proceeding are resolved, rather than just when the judgment becomes final.
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2025 · House May 5, 2025
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
May 29, 2025
D
Democratic11
100% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
4
Committee
5
May 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
upper
May 20, 2025
Committee
Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
upper
May 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported favorably.
upper
May 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 98, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported with amendments (13-0).
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Josh Carlson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 123
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 123. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline