JUDGES: (Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2022
Committee Review
May 2022
House Passage
May 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 2, 2022
Last action May 24, 2022
Floor votes · House May 23, 2022
How they voted
68–28
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 101
May 23, 2022
D
Democratic33
78% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican67
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
1
Committee
5
Amendments
1
May 24, 2022
Committee
Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
upper
May 23, 2022
Lower · Passed
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 70, nays 29. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
lower
May 17, 2022
Introduced
Reported without amendments (13-0-1).
lower
May 9, 2022
Committee
Read by title, ordered engrossed, recommitted to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
May 5, 2022
Committee
Reported favorably (8-4. To be recommitted to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
lower
Mar 14, 2022
Committee
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
Mar 2, 2022
Committee
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lawrence "Larry" Frieman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 366
Scope: LA
Hi! I can help you understand HB 366. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline