Investment partnership tax.
SB 316 establishes rules for determining where income from investment partnerships is taxed, directly affecting investment partnerships and their owners. The bill defines "investment partnership" and sets specific sourcing rules for calculating their adjusted gross income for tax purposes. This clarifies how income is attributed to the state for tax reporting, without changing tax rates or creating new taxes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2025
Last action Mar 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Senate Bill (S)
→
Senate Bill (H)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to update the title format and add a new eligibility requirement for partnerships to qualify for investment security definitions. The amendment also changes the effective date reference and updates the legislative history section to reflect the committee's favorable report.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include additional partnership eligibility criteria, requiring partnerships to meet a percentage test in three of the five most recent taxable years to qualify.
ELIGIBILITY
Added a new requirement that partnerships must meet a percentage test in three of the five most recent taxable years to qualify for investment security definitions.
DEFINITION
Changed the definition of 'qualifying investment securities' to include additional partnership eligibility criteria.
TIMELINE
Updated the effective date reference from January 1, 2026, to reflect the amended version of the bill.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill title format and legislative history section to reflect the amended version of the bill.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 10, 2025
How they voted
47–2
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Feb 10, 2025
D
Democratic10
80% Yea
R
Republican40
97% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
2
Committee
1
Feb 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 91: yeas 47, nays 2
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
upper
3 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Craig Snow
RRepublican
P
Scott Baldwin
RRepublican
P
Travis Holdman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 316
Scope: IN
Hi! I can help you understand SB 316. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline