School referendum levies.
Summary
Provides that a school corporation must distribute a portion of revenue received from a school operating referendum tax levy or school safety referendum levy to each charter school in which students who receive not more than 50% virtual instruction and who have legal settlement in the school corporation attend. Provides that if a charter school receives a distribution from a school corporation from a school corporation tax levy or a school safety referendum tax levy, the charter school must post the certain information on the charter school's Internet web site. Provides that a charter school that may receive money from a school corporation's tax levy or a school safety referendum tax levy may not promote a position on a referendum in the same manner as a school corporation is prohibited from promoting a position on a referendum. Provides that the governing body of a school corporation in which 10% or more of the school corporation's school buildings are occupied in whole or part by: (1) one or more innovation network schools; or (2) one or more participating innovation network charter schools; may sell a closed, unused, or unoccupied school building without first offering the school building to a charter school or state educational institution. Makes conforming amendments.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2022
Committee Review
Jan 2022
House Passage
Jan 2022
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 4, 2022
Last action Feb 10, 2022
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
2
Committee
2
Amendments
9
Jan 28, 2022
Committee
Referred to the Senate
lower
Jan 27, 2022
Lower · Passed
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 138: yeas 52, nays 39
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #9 (Porter) motion withdrawn
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #8 (DeLaney) failed; Roll Call 110: yeas 28, nays 67
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #7 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 109: yeas 26, nays 62
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #11 (Smith V) motion withdrawn
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #4 (Porter) failed; voice vote
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #3 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 108: yeas 27, nays 63
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #5 (Harris) failed; Roll Call 107: yeas 26, nays 65
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #2 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 106: yeas 24, nays 66
lower
Jan 26, 2022
Amended
Amendment #1 (Behning) prevailed; voice vote
lower
Jan 24, 2022
Lower · Passed
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
lower
2 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Behning
RRepublican
P
Brian Buchanan
RRepublican
Co
Jake Teshka
RRepublican
Co
Tim O'Brien
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1072
Scope: IN
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1072. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline