DRUG ASSET-CRIMINAL-FORFEITURE
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Adds the State's Attorney's Investigative Subpoenas Article to the Code. Provides that at any time prior to the commencement of a prosecution and upon written application by the State's Attorney, the circuit court shall cause the clerk of the court to issue subpoenas ad testificandum or duces tecum directed to the sheriff or coroner of any county in the State for the purpose of obtaining the testimony of any person or any document or material relevant to a criminal matter being investigated by the State's Attorney. Establishes procedures under which the State's Attorney may apply for the issuance of such subpoenas. Provides that the State's Attorney shall promptly provide a complete transcript or electronic recording of all testimony taken pursuant to a subpoena issued under this Article to the court that issued the subpoena. Provides for disclosure of the existence of the subpoena issued or materials obtained pursuant to the Article to an attorney representing a person or other entity subpoenaed. Provides that the Attorney General, in cooperation with the Illinois State's Attorney Association, shall annually provide a course of training to the State's Attorneys, in the legal, ethical, and practical aspects of the provisions of the Article relating to investigation and prosecutorial functions. Effective immediately.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2012
Committee Review
Mar 2012
Senate Passage
Mar 2012
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 29, 2012
Last action Jan 8, 2013
Floor votes · Senate Mar 29, 2012
How they voted
51–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 58
Mar 29, 2012
D
Democratic34
91% Yea
R
Republican24
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
1
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Jan 8, 2013
Senate · Failed
Session Sine Die
Mar 29, 2012
House · Referred to committee
Referred to Rules Committee
Mar 29, 2012
House · Introduced
Arrived in House
Mar 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (51-0-7)
Mar 27, 2012
Senate · Reported by committee
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 009-000-000
Mar 26, 2012
Senate · Amendment adopted
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Adopted
Mar 26, 2012
Senate · Amendment adopted
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
Mar 22, 2012
Senate · Reported by committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
Mar 22, 2012
Senate · Reported by committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
Mar 19, 2012
Senate · Referred to committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Assignments
Mar 19, 2012
Senate · Amendment offered
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. William R. Haine
Mar 12, 2012
Senate · Referred to committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
Mar 12, 2012
Senate · Amendment offered
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. William R. Haine
Mar 9, 2012
Senate · Reported by committee
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As March 30, 2012
Feb 24, 2012
Senate · Referred to committee
Assigned to Judiciary
Feb 10, 2012
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Assignments
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
Co
William R. Haine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 3778
Scope: IL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 3778. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline