SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING ACT
Summary
Creates the Supported Decision-Making Agreement Act. Authorizes the creation of supported decision-making agreements and allows a supporter to assist a principal with an intellectual or developmental disability in accessing, collecting, or obtaining information that is relevant to a decision authorized under the supported decision-making agreement. Provides that all adults are presumed to be capable of making decisions regarding daily living and to have capacity unless otherwise determined by a court. Provides that certain persons are disqualified from acting as a supporter. Provides that a supporter may exercise the authority granted to the supporter in the supported decision-making agreement. Provides for the duties of a supporter in a supported decision-making agreement. Prohibits a supporter from doing certain actions in relation to the principal. Requires 2 or more witnesses to be present and sign and date a supported decision-making agreement. Provides a form for a supported decision-making agreement. Provides that a person is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in professional misconduct for an act or omission under certain circumstances. Provides that a decision or request made or communicated with the assistance of a supporter shall be recognized as the decision or request of the principal and may be enforced by the principal or supporter on the same basis as a decision or request of the principal. Provides that if a person who receives a copy or is aware of the existence of a supported decision-making agreement and has cause to believe that the principal is being abused, neglected, or exploited by the supporter, the person shall report the alleged abuse, neglect, or exploitation. Provides that any interested party with a reasonable basis to believe that the supporter is abusing or neglecting the principal shall have the right to petition for the appointment of a limited temporary guardian and a guardian ad litem for the purpose of determining if the support decision-making agreement should be terminated. Provides for the termination of a supported decision-making agreement. Provides that a principal may revoke the supported decision-making agreement and invalidate the supported decision-making agreement at any time. Provides that a supporter may resign by giving notice to the principal. Effective immediately. House Committee Amendment No. 2 Deletes language providing that a person against whom there has been a finding of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the principal, a child, an elderly individual, or a person with a disability is disqualified from acting as a supporter. Instead disqualifies a person who is listed on the Health Care Worker Registry maintained by the Department of Public Health as ineligible to work. Deletes language providing that a person against whom the principal has obtained an order of protection is disqualified from acting as a supporter. Instead disqualifies an individual who is the subject of a civil or criminal order prohibiting contact with the principal. Deletes language providing that any interested party with a reasonable basis to believe that the supporter is abusing or neglecting the principal shall have the right to petition for the appointment of a limited temporary guardian and a guardian ad litem for the purpose of determining if the support decision-making agreement should be terminated. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Allows a supporter in a supported decision-making agreement to ascertain the wishes and decisions of the principal in order to advocate that the wishes and decisions of an individual with disabilities are implemented (rather than "ascertain the wishes and decisions of the principal, assist in communicating those wishes and decisions to other persons, and advocate to ensure that the wishes and decisions of the principal are implemented"). Requires the Guardianship and Advocacy Commission to develop training and education materials for both principals and supporters. Provides that the Act is effective 6 months after becoming law (rather than immediately).
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2021
Committee Review
May 2021
House Passage
May 2021
Senate Passage
May 2021
Signed into Law
Aug 2021
Introduced Apr 27, 2021
Signed Aug 27, 2021
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2021 · House Apr 23, 2021
How they voted
46–0
Passed
Total votes 46
May 29, 2021
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican17
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
63
Key actions
13
Committee
16
Amendments
7
Aug 27, 2021
Signed into law
Governor Approved
lower
May 31, 2021
Lower · Passed
Passed Both Houses
lower
May 31, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs 117-000-000
lower
May 30, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary - Civil Committee; 015-000-000
lower
May 30, 2021
Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary - Civil Committee
lower
May 30, 2021
Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
lower
May 30, 2021
Lower · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
lower
May 29, 2021
Introduced
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1
lower
May 29, 2021
Introduced
Arrived in House
lower
May 29, 2021
Upper · Passed
Third Reading - Passed; 059-000-000
upper
May 19, 2021
Upper · Passed
Do Pass as Amended Judiciary; 007-000-000
upper
May 18, 2021
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
upper
May 17, 2021
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
upper
May 14, 2021
Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 14, 2021
Introduced
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Sara Feigenholtz
upper
May 10, 2021
Committee
Assigned to Judiciary
upper
Apr 27, 2021
Committee
Referred to Assignments
upper
Apr 27, 2021
Introduced
Arrive in Senate
upper
Apr 23, 2021
Lower · Passed
Third Reading - Consent Calendar - Passed 099-000-000
lower
Mar 23, 2021
Amended
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 40
lower
Mar 23, 2021
Lower · Passed
Do Pass as Amended / Consent Calendar Judiciary - Civil Committee; 016-000-000
lower
Mar 23, 2021
Lower · Passed
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Adopted in Judiciary - Civil Committee; by Voice Vote
lower
Mar 18, 2021
Lower · Passed
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Committee
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Introduced
House Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Committee
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Introduced
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Lindsey LaPointe
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Committee
Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
lower
Feb 22, 2021
Committee
Referred to Rules Committee
lower
2 primary · 16 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lindsey LaPointe
DDemocratic
P
Sara Feigenholtz
DDemocratic
Co
Amy Grant
RRepublican
Co
Ann Williams
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Morgan
DDemocratic
Co
Chapin Rose
RRepublican
Co
Curtis Tarver
DDemocratic
Co
Dan Caulkins
RRepublican
Co
Dan Didech
DDemocratic
Co
David A. Welter
RRepublican
Co
Emanuel Chris Welch
DDemocratic
Co
Jen Gong-Gershowitz
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 3849
Scope: IL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 3849. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline