TOLL HIGHWAY OASIS REMOVAL
Summary
Amends the Toll Highway Act. Provides that, if the acquisition, construction, relocation, operation, regulation, or maintenance of a toll highway requires the relocation of public utilities due to the elimination of a tollway oasis bridge, the Illinois Highway Authority must conduct an assessment in order to determine the most cost-effective means of providing utility service to associated tollway property that remains. Provides that such an assessment shall include an estimate of the total cost of the required relocation of the utilities, an examination of alternative options for the provision of utilities to the relevant tollway property, and the associated costs of each. Provides that, if the assessment indicates that the most cost-effective means of providing utility service to tollway property is via the adjacent municipality, the Authority shall require that the relevant utilities be provided to the tollway property by the adjacent municipality, which shall be appropriately compensated from the sales tax proceeds generated from the subject tollway property. Provides for an intergovernmental agreement to effectuate adequate compensation for the adjacent municipality. Provides that, when a tollway oasis bridge is eliminated, the Authority must conduct an assessment in order to determine the impacts the modification will have on adjacent municipalities and whether, in the interest of equity, such adjacent municipalities should share in any sales tax revenues. Provides that the analysis shall consider several specific criteria relating to pollution, private nuisance, frequency of usage, and the need for public services. Provides that, if the Authority determines that any municipality adjacent to the tollway property is substantially impacted by activities or businesses conducted on the property, it shall be appropriately compensated. Provides that the Authority, the municipality wherein the tollway property is located, and the impacted adjacent municipality shall enter into an intergovernmental agreement to effectuate the requirements and provide for adequate compensation.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2019
Committee Review
May 2019
House Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Apr 10, 2019
Last action May 31, 2019
Floor votes · House Apr 10, 2019
How they voted
100–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 106
Apr 10, 2019
D
Democratic69
95% Yea
R
Republican37
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
11
May 31, 2019
Committee
Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 24, 2019
upper
May 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 17, 2019
upper
Apr 24, 2019
Committee
Assigned to Executive
upper
Apr 10, 2019
Committee
Referred to Assignments
upper
Apr 10, 2019
Introduced
Arrive in Senate
upper
Apr 10, 2019
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (100-1-5)
house
Mar 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Do Pass / Short Debate Revenue & Finance Committee; 015-000-000
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Reported Back To Revenue & Finance Committee;
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Recommends Do Pass Subcommittee/ Revenue & Finance Committee; 006-000-000
lower
Mar 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
To Sales, Amusement & Other Taxes Subcommittee
lower
Mar 5, 2019
Committee
Assigned to Revenue & Finance Committee
lower
Feb 15, 2019
Committee
Referred to Rules Committee
lower
0 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 3172
Scope: IL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 3172. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline