GEOLOCATION PRIVACY PROTECTION
Summary
Creates the Geolocation Privacy Protection Act. Defines "geolocation information", "location-based application", and "private entity". Provides that a private entity may not collect, use, store, or disclose geolocation information from a location-based application on a person's device unless the private entity first receives the person's affirmative express consent after complying with specified notice requirements. Provides exceptions. Provides that a person whose rights are violated may recover: (1) liquidated damages of $1,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater; (2) reasonable attorney's fees and costs; and (3) other relief, including an injunction, as the court may deem appropriate. Provides that authority to seek remedies and impose penalties granted to the Attorney General under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act is also granted to the Attorney General for the enforcement of the Geolocation Privacy Protection Act. Provides that in any action brought by the Attorney General to enforce the Act, the court may order that persons who incurred actual damages be awarded 3 times the amount at which actual damages are assessed. Provides that a violation of the Act constitutes an unlawful practice under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Provides that the provisions of the Act may not be waived. Contains applicability language. Makes a corresponding change in the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Effective immediately.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2017
Committee Review
Jun 2017
House Passage
Jun 2017
Senate Passage
May 2017
Vetoed
Oct 2017
Introduced May 2, 2017
Vetoed Oct 27, 2017
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2017 · House Jun 27, 2017
How they voted
26–20
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 48
May 25, 2017
D
Democratic28
89% Yea
R
Republican20
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
101
Key actions
14
Committee
25
Amendments
24
Oct 27, 2017
Vetoed
Total Veto Stands - No Positive Action Taken
lower
Oct 12, 2017
Vetoed
Placed on Calendar Total Veto
lower
Sep 22, 2017
Vetoed
Governor Vetoed
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
Passed Both Houses
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 House Concurs 063-038-002
lower
Jun 27, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 House Concurs 063-038-002
lower
Jun 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee; 006-002-002
lower
Jun 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee; 006-002-002
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Ann M. Williams
lower
Jun 25, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Ann M. Williams
lower
May 30, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted - Lost Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee; 005-002-003
lower
May 30, 2017
Lower · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted - Lost Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee; 005-002-003
lower
May 28, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee
lower
May 28, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee
lower
May 28, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
lower
May 28, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
lower
May 28, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Ann M. Williams
lower
May 28, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Ann M. Williams
lower
May 25, 2017
Introduced
Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 4, 5
lower
May 25, 2017
Introduced
Arrived in House
lower
May 25, 2017
Amended
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
upper
May 25, 2017
Amended
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
upper
May 25, 2017
Amended
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)
upper
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Adopted; T. Cullerton
upper
May 25, 2017
Upper · Passed
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Adopted; T. Cullerton
upper
May 25, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Recommend Do Adopt Judiciary; 008-003-000
upper
May 25, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Recommend Do Adopt Judiciary; 008-003-000
upper
May 25, 2017
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-20-2)
senate
May 24, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
upper
May 24, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
upper
May 23, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 23, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 5 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Thomas Cullerton
upper
May 23, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 23, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Thomas Cullerton
upper
May 22, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Assignments Refers to Judiciary
upper
May 19, 2017
Committee
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 19, 2017
Introduced
Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Thomas Cullerton
upper
May 16, 2017
Upper · Passed
Do Pass Judiciary; 007-003-000
upper
May 16, 2017
Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 16, 2017
Introduced
Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Thomas Cullerton
upper
May 15, 2017
Upper · Passed
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-8(b-1), this amendment will remain in the Committee on Assignments
upper
May 12, 2017
Upper · Passed
Rule 2-10 Committee Deadline Established As May 19, 2017
upper
May 12, 2017
Committee
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
upper
May 12, 2017
Introduced
Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Thomas Cullerton
upper
May 12, 2017
Committee
Assigned to Judiciary
upper
May 2, 2017
Committee
Referred to Assignments
upper
May 2, 2017
Introduced
Arrive in Senate
upper
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted
lower
Apr 27, 2017
Lower · Passed
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee; 006-002-001
lower
Apr 26, 2017
Lower · Passed
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Rules Refers to Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Committee
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee
lower
Apr 25, 2017
Introduced
House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Ann M. Williams
lower
0 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 3449
Scope: IL
Hi! I can help you understand HB 3449. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline