RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLE RENTAL FEES.
SB 398 prohibits rental car companies from charging an additional fee for a lessee's spouse when the spouse is listed as a driver on the rental agreement. This directly affects renters who wish to include their spouse as a driver without incurring extra costs. The bill's key provision bans this specific fee under defined conditions, though the abstract does not specify those conditions. It represents a direct policy change limiting rental fee structures for spouses. The bill passed committee recommendation with all supporting votes in early 2025.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
SB398
→
SB398_SD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was converted from an House bill (HB) to a Senate bill (SB) and updated with new Senate-specific metadata. The primary substantive change is the addition of a retroactivity clause (Section 2), which clarifies that the new law does not affect rights, penalties, or legal proceedings that occurred before the bill's effective date. Additionally, Section 3 was expanded to include a constitutional contract clause, ensuring the law does not violate existing contracts under state or federal constitutions.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on motor vehicle rental fees, but the applicability is now explicitly limited regarding past events through the addition of retroactivity and contract protection clauses.
TIMELINE
Added Section 2 to state that the Act does not affect rights, penalties, or proceedings that occurred before its effective date.
REQUIREMENT
Added Section 3 to ensure the Act does not impair existing contracts in violation of the Hawaii State Constitution or the U.S. Constitution.
TECHNICAL
Updated bill metadata to reflect Senate filing (SD1) and revised the chapter reference in Section 1 from 437E to 437D.
Removed the original introductory text and the instruction regarding underscored statutory material.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Feb 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to CPN.
upper
Feb 11, 2025
Committee
Reported from TCA (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 263) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to CPN.
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on TCA recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in TCA were as follows: 5 Aye(s): Senator(s) Lee, C., Inouye, Elefante, Kanuha, DeCorte; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 0 Excused: none.
upper
Jan 31, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on TCA has scheduled a public hearing on 02-04-25 3:00PM; Conference Room 224 & Videoconference.
upper
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to TCA, CPN.
upper
Jan 15, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and passed First Reading.
upper
Jan 14, 2025
Introduced
Pending Introduction.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Karl Rhoads
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 398
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 398. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline