RELATING TO GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT.
Summary
Establishes the criminal offense of promoting an illegal electronic gambling device. Authorizes civil penalties and actions relating to premises on which an illegal electronic gambling device has been used. Allows the Attorney General, any county prosecuting attorney, any county police chief, or the Director of Law Enforcement to take certain actions against places used to commit certain offenses that qualify as a nuisance. Effective 3/22/2075. (SD1)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 30, 2026
Last action Mar 18, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
SB3281
→
SB3281_SD1
·
5 edits
MODERATE
This bill adds a new nuisance abatement mechanism to address illegal gambling devices, allowing law enforcement to seek court orders that lock premises, appoint receivers, or enforce extended closures for repeat offenders. It also clarifies the definition of 'illegal electronic gambling device' and updates the effective date of the law to March 22, 2075.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of enforcement by adding a specific nuisance abatement process (Section 4) that was not present in the original version, targeting properties where illegal gambling has occurred more than once in a twelve-month period.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new provision allowing the Attorney General and other law enforcement officials to seek judicial orders for locking premises, receivership, or extended closures for properties used for illegal gambling more than twice in a year.
TIMELINE
Changed the effective date of the Act from immediate approval to March 22, 2075.
DEFINITION
Added specific definitions for 'Notice' and 'Violation' to clarify when enforcement actions can be triggered.
REQUIREMENT
Modified the liability section to require property owners to issue written demands and commence eviction proceedings within ten business days of receiving notice.
SCOPE
Added a new purpose to the bill to allow the Attorney General and others to take actions against places used to commit offenses that qualify as a nuisance.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Mar 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to JHA, referral sheet 17
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Introduced
Received from Senate (Sen. Com. No. 398) in amended form (SD 1).
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Third Reading, as amended (SD 1). Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House.
upper
Mar 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Feb 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in JDC were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Rhoads, Chang, San Buenaventura, Awa; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Gabbard.
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC has scheduled a public hearing on 02-24-26 9:45AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Committee
Re-Referred to JDC.
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to PSM, JDC.
upper
Jan 30, 2026
Introduced
Introduced.
upper
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Lee
DDemocratic
P
Donovan Dela Cruz
DDemocratic
P
Stanley Chang
DDemocratic
P
Troy Hashimoto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 3281
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 3281. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline