RELATING TO REDRESS FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT.
What changed between versions
Replaced the requirement for a finding of 'actual innocence' with the broader standard of 'grounds consistent with innocence' to determine eligibility for compensation.
Changed the burden of proof so the State must prove the petitioner is ineligible or committed misconduct, rather than the petitioner having to prove innocence.
Established a presumption that petitions filed by individuals with reversed convictions or pardons are valid unless the State proves otherwise.
Modified the advance compensation process to ensure payments cease if new charges are filed, and clarified that denied petitioners do not need to repay advance funds.
Updated the statutory language to remove references to 'actual innocence' and align the definition of wrongful conviction with the new 'grounds consistent with innocence' standard.