RELATING TO PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS.
Summary
Clarifies the grounds for an appeal of non-renewal or revocation of a charter contract. Authorizes public charters schools to appeal directly to the Board of Education on matters regarding the schools' operations, governance, or funding, with certain exceptions. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD2)
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB901_HD1
→
HB901_HD2
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill revision clarifies the specific grounds for appealing a charter school contract non-renewal or revocation, explicitly including procedural errors and statutory violations. It also refines the rules for adverse decisions by removing the exception for performance reviews while maintaining the ability to appeal operational, governance, and funding issues. The changes aim to streamline the appeal process and provide clearer criteria for when a school can challenge an authorizer's decision.
Scope change
The scope of appealable matters was narrowed by removing the ability to appeal negative performance reviews, while the grounds for appealing non-renewal or revocation were expanded to explicitly list procedural errors and statutory violations.
ELIGIBILITY
Clarified that appeals for non-renewal or revocation are valid if the authorizer alleges procedural errors, statutory violations, or lack of compliance with contractual obligations.
Removed the ability to appeal negative performance reviews directly to the board, limiting appeals to matters affecting operation, governance, or funding.
REQUIREMENT
Replaced the phrase 'shall have the power to' with 'may' regarding the board's authority to decide appeals.
TECHNICAL
Updated bill metadata, including the header designation from HD1 to HD2 and adjusted line counts and timestamps.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to EDU, JDC.
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 301).
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed Third Reading as amended in HD 2 with Representative(s) Iwamoto voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Pierick, Ward excused (2). Transmitted to Senate.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 8 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Hashem, Kahaloa, Takayama, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: Representative(s) Belatti; 1 Noes: Representative(s) Perruso; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran, Todd.
lower
Feb 13, 2025
Committee
Reported from EDN (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 561) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA.
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on EDN recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 11 Ayes: Representative(s) Woodson, La Chica, Amato, Evslin, Garrett, Kapela, Kila, Olds, Sayama, Muraoka, Souza; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and Excused: none.
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
Referred to EDN, JHA, referral sheet 3
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Justin Woodson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 901
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 901. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline