RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION.
Summary
Redefines "historic property" with respect to the State Historic Preservation Program. Deletes the requirement for an application for a proposed project on an existing privately-owned single-family detached dwelling unit to have a historic preservation review if the unit or townhouse is over fifty years old.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 17, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB737
→
HB737_HD1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill amends the definition of 'historic property' to remove the automatic requirement for historic preservation reviews on single-family homes and townhouses simply because they are over fifty years old. Instead, these properties will only require a review if they are officially listed on a historic register, nominated for listing, or located within a designated historic district. This change narrows the scope of the law to apply only to properties with recognized historic status, reducing administrative burdens for older homes that lack such designation.
Scope change
The bill significantly narrows the scope of applicability by removing the age-based threshold (over 50 years) as a standalone trigger for historic preservation reviews, limiting the requirement to properties with specific official historic designations.
ELIGIBILITY
Removed the eligibility criterion that any single-family detached dwelling or townhouse over fifty years old automatically requires a historic preservation review.
Added the requirement that single-family homes or townhouses must be listed on a historic register, nominated for listing, or located in a historic district to trigger a review.
DEFINITION
Updated the definition of 'historic property' to clarify that age alone is insufficient without an official historic designation.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the procedural requirements for proposed projects on older homes to depend on official historic status rather than just the building's age.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
1
Committee
4
Feb 6, 2025
Committee
Reported from HSG (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 209) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to WAL.
lower
Jan 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on HSG recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Evslin, Miyake, Grandinetti, Kila, La Chica, Muraoka, Pierick; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran, Kitagawa.
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to HSG, WAL, JHA, referral sheet 4
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to WAL, JHA, referral sheet 2
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
16 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cory Chun
DDemocratic
P
David Tarnas
DDemocratic
P
Dee Morikawa
DDemocratic
P
Elijah Pierick
RRepublican
P
Gregg Takayama
DDemocratic
P
Jenna Takenouchi
DDemocratic
P
Kanani Souza
RRepublican
P
Kim Coco Iwamoto
DDemocratic
P
Kirstin Kahaloa
DDemocratic
P
Lauren Matsumoto
RRepublican
P
Lisa Marten
DDemocratic
P
Luke Evslin
DDemocratic
P
Nicole Lowen
DDemocratic
P
Scot Matayoshi
DDemocratic
P
Sue Lee Loy
DDemocratic
P
Tyson Miyake
DDemocratic
Co
Terez Amato
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 737
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 737. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline