RELATING TO SAFE ENTRYWAYS.
Summary
Establishes, for a county with a population greater than three hundred thousand, enforcement procedures to prevent people or personal property from blocking or otherwise impeding ingress or egress to private doorways and entranceways. Effective 7/1/3000. (SD1)
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2026
Last action Apr 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB1957_HD1
→
HB1957_SD1
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to change its application from cities to counties, expanding the geographic scope of enforcement. This adjustment ensures the new rules regarding blocking entranceways apply to larger county jurisdictions rather than just specific cities, likely to accommodate areas that have grown beyond city limits or to standardize enforcement across broader regions.
Scope change
The bill's applicability was expanded from 'cities' to 'counties' with a population of 300,000 or more.
SCOPE
Changed the jurisdiction from cities to counties for the population threshold of 300,000.
DEFINITION
Updated the definition of prohibited activity to apply to counties instead of cities.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header and version numbers to reflect the Senate Draft 1 status.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Apr 1, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on JDC will hold a public decision making on 04-07-26 10:15AM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to JDC.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Committee
Reported from PSM (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 3165) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to JDC.
upper
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on PSM recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in PSM were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Fukunaga, Lee, C., Hashimoto, DeCorte; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) Inouye.
upper
Mar 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on PSM has scheduled a public hearing on 03-20-26 3:15PM; Conference Room 016 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 12, 2026
Committee
Referred to PSM, JDC.
upper
Mar 12, 2026
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 324).
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed Third Reading with Representative(s) Iwamoto voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and none excused (0). Transmitted to Senate.
lower
Mar 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 9 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Belatti, Hashem, Kahaloa, Sayama, Takayama, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran.
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Referred to JHA, referral sheet 3
lower
Jan 26, 2026
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
15 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Adrian Tam
DDemocratic
P
Darius Kila
DDemocratic
P
Diamond Garcia
RRepublican
P
Elijah Pierick
RRepublican
P
Gregg Takayama
DDemocratic
P
Greggor Ilagan
DDemocratic
P
Ikaika Olds
DDemocratic
P
Jenna Takenouchi
DDemocratic
P
Joe Gedeon
RRepublican
P
Julie Reyes Oda
RRepublican
P
Kanani Souza
RRepublican
P
Lauren Matsumoto
RRepublican
P
Lisa Marten
DDemocratic
P
Matthias Kusch
DDemocratic
P
Scot Matayoshi
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1957
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1957. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline