RELATING TO THE DEFENSE OF STATE EMPLOYEES.
Summary
Requires the State to defend professionally licensed or certified state employees from civil actions or proceedings, under certain circumstances. Clarifies that the employee may employ their own attorney at the employee's own expense. Establishes a process for the Attorney General to transfer or withdraw representation if the Attorney General declines to defend the employee. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2025
Last action Dec 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB166
→
HB166_HD1
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was updated to reflect its first House District (HD1) version, changing the effective date from immediate approval to July 1, 3000, and adjusting the withdrawal notice period to 'no less than thirty days'. These changes clarify the timeline for when the law applies and refine the procedural requirements for the Attorney General when withdrawing legal representation.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on requiring the State to defend professionally licensed or certified state employees, but the effective date is now set to a future year (3000) rather than upon approval.
TIMELINE
The effective date was changed from 'upon approval' to 'July 1, 3000', significantly delaying when the law takes effect.
REQUIREMENT
The requirement for the Attorney General to file a motion to withdraw as counsel was adjusted to 'no less than thirty days' instead of 'not less than thirty days'.
TECHNICAL
The header information was updated to reflect the bill version as 'HB166 HD1' and included new metadata fields.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Feb 13, 2025
Committee
Reported from JHA (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 597) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to FIN.
lower
Feb 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Belatti, Hashem, Kahaloa, Perruso, Takayama, Todd, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to JHA, FIN, referral sheet 1
lower
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 14, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled.
lower
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 166
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 166. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline