REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND TOURISM TO REVIEW AND EVALUATE THE COST-BENEFIT AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF A POSSIBLE SPONSORSHIP OF A MICHELIN GUIDE FOR RESTAURANTS ACROSS THE STATE.
This non-binding Senate Resolution (SR 46) requests Hawaii's Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to evaluate the potential cost-benefit of sponsoring a Michelin Guide for the state's restaurants. It aims to assess whether such a sponsorship could boost culinary tourism, attract skilled workforce talent (as noted in a 2022 tourism report), and elevate restaurant standards. The resolution does not mandate sponsorship but asks the department to review feasibility and return on investment. It directly affects Hawaii's restaurant industry and tourism promotion efforts, though no concrete policy change is enacted by the resolution itself.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 7, 2025
Last action Apr 2, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
SR46
→
SR46_SD1
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill was modified from a simple request to sponsor a Michelin Guide into a request for the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to first review and evaluate the cost-benefit and return on investment of such sponsorship. This adds a preliminary analysis requirement before any sponsorship action can be taken, ensuring fiscal responsibility before committing state resources.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by adding a prerequisite evaluation step; the department must assess the financial implications before proceeding with any Michelin Guide sponsorship.
REQUIREMENT
The resolution now requires the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to review and evaluate the cost-benefit and return on investment of a Michelin Guide sponsorship before taking action, rather than directly requesting sponsorship.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate. No roll call record of that vote is available.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Apr 2, 2025
Upper · Passed
Report and Resolution Adopted as amended (SD1). Aye(s) with reservations: none. Noes, 1 (Senator(s) Awa).
upper
Apr 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported from EDT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1451) with recommendation of adoption, as amended (SD 1).
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on EDT recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes in EDT were as follows: 3 Aye(s): Senator(s) DeCoite, Wakai, Fukunaga; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 2 Excused: Senator(s) Kim, Awa.
upper
Mar 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
The committee(s) on EDT has scheduled a public hearing on 03-25-25 1:00PM; Conference Room 229 & Videoconference.
upper
Mar 11, 2025
Committee
Referred to EDT.
upper
Mar 7, 2025
Introduced
Offered.
upper
5 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SR 46
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand SR 46. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline