RELATING TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION.
Summary
Redefines "historic property" with respect to the State Historic Preservation Program. Deletes the requirement for an application for a proposed project on an existing privately-owned single-family detached dwelling unit to have a historic preservation review if the unit or townhouse is over fifty years old.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 17, 2025
Last action Feb 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB737
→
HB737_HD1
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill redefines 'historic property' to remove the automatic 50-year age threshold, requiring properties to meet specific criteria (listing on historic registers, nomination, or location in historic districts) instead. It also clarifies that historic preservation review applies only to properties meeting these criteria rather than all properties over 50 years old.
Scope change
The bill narrows the scope of historic preservation review requirements by replacing the blanket 50-year age rule with specific eligibility criteria based on historic register status, nominations, or district location.
DEFINITION
Changed the definition of 'historic property' to require meeting specific criteria (historic register listing, nomination, or historic district location) instead of automatically qualifying based on being over 50 years old.
ELIGIBILITY
Modified eligibility for historic preservation review on single-family detached dwellings and townhouses from automatic review for properties over 50 years old to review only for properties meeting specific historic criteria.
REQUIREMENT
Updated requirements for proposed projects on existing privately-owned single-family detached dwelling units or townhouses to apply only when the property meets specific historic property criteria rather than age alone.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
4
Feb 6, 2025
Committee
Reported from HSG (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 209) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to WAL.
lower
Jan 31, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on HSG recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 7 Ayes: Representative(s) Evslin, Miyake, Grandinetti, Kila, La Chica, Muraoka, Pierick; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 2 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran, Kitagawa.
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to HSG, WAL, JHA, referral sheet 4
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to WAL, JHA, referral sheet 2
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
16 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Cory Chun
DDemocratic
P
David Tarnas
DDemocratic
P
Dee Morikawa
DDemocratic
P
Elijah Pierick
RRepublican
P
Gregg Takayama
DDemocratic
P
Jenna Takenouchi
DDemocratic
P
Kanani Souza
RRepublican
P
Kim Coco Iwamoto
DDemocratic
P
Kirstin Kahaloa
DDemocratic
P
Lauren Matsumoto
RRepublican
P
Lisa Marten
DDemocratic
P
Luke Evslin
DDemocratic
P
Nicole Lowen
DDemocratic
P
Scot Matayoshi
DDemocratic
P
Sue Lee Loy
DDemocratic
P
Tyson Miyake
DDemocratic
Co
Terez Amato
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 737
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 737. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline