RELATING TO UNCREWED AIRCRAFT OFFENSES.
HB 389 clarifies that using an uncrewed aircraft (drone) to assist in committing a felony - such as burglary or theft - constitutes a separate felony offense. It directly affects individuals who use drones to aid in other criminal activities. The bill establishes that the drone's use becomes a distinct felony charge when employed to further another crime, rather than relying on the underlying felony alone. This provides clearer legal consequences for drone-related criminal conduct without altering penalties for the primary offense.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 16, 2025
Last action Mar 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
HB389
→
HB389_HD1
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill updates Hawaii's uncrewed aircraft (drone) laws by clarifying which offenses are considered felonies and adjusting the exemptions for law enforcement personnel. The changes refine the legal definitions to ensure consistent application of penalties for serious drone misuse while protecting authorized government operations.
Scope change
The bill modifies the scope of criminal penalties for uncrewed aircraft offenses, specifically clarifying which subsections apply to felony-level charges and updating the list of exempted personnel.
ENFORCEMENT
Updated the list of exempted personnel in Section 1 to clarify that only subsections (a) through (d) and (f) apply to police, corrections, and fire department personnel acting within their official duties, removing subsection (g) from the exemption list.
Reorganized the felony-level offenses in Section 2 to ensure consistent numbering and clarity, particularly regarding the use of uncrewed aircraft in furtherance of a felony.
DEFINITION
Clarified the language around property damage thresholds and intoxicant influence to align with standard legal definitions.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the House by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to TCA, JDC.
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Introduced
Received from House (Hse. Com. No. 223).
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed Third Reading with none voting aye with reservations; none voting no (0) and Representative(s) Pierick, Ward excused (2). Transmitted to Senate.
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
The committee on JHA recommend that the measure be PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS. The votes were as follows: 10 Ayes: Representative(s) Tarnas, Poepoe, Belatti, Hashem, Kahaloa, Perruso, Takayama, Todd, Garcia, Shimizu; Ayes with reservations: none; Noes: none; and 1 Excused: Representative(s) Cochran.
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to JHA, referral sheet 1
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
lower
Jan 16, 2025
Introduced
Pending introduction.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nadine Nakamura
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 389
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 389. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline