RELATING TO LIFEGUARDS.
Summary
Establishes an exception to liability for a person qualified as a county lifeguard and the lifeguard's employing county if the lifeguard renders rescue, resuscitative, or other lifeguard services without remuneration or expectation of remuneration on a beach or in the ocean while in the scope of employment as a county lifeguard, for civil damages resulting from the person's acts or omissions while providing rescue, resuscitative, or other lifeguard services, except for damages that may result from the person's gross negligence or wanton acts or omissions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2021
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2021
Last action Dec 10, 2021
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
0
Committee
1
Jan 27, 2021
House · Referred to committee
Referred to JHA, FIN, referral sheet 1
Jan 25, 2021
House · Introduced
Introduced and Pass First Reading.
Jan 22, 2021
House · Introduced
Pending introduction.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Nakashima
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 665
Scope: HI
Hi! I can help you understand HB 665. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline