Cybersecurity Standards and Liability
Summary
Cybersecurity Standards and Liability; Prohibiting local governments from imposing certain cybersecurity standards or processes on vendors; providing that a local government, a covered entity, or a third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident under certain circumstances; requiring covered entities and third-party agents to implement revised frameworks, standards, laws, or regulations within a specified timeframe in order to retain protection from liability, etc.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Last action Mar 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
S 692 Filed
→
S 692 c1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to shift from authorizing local governments to set cybersecurity rules to explicitly prohibiting them from imposing standards on vendors that exceed state-set limits. This change strengthens vendor protections against local mandates while maintaining the core liability shield for entities that follow state-approved frameworks.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding local government authority over vendors was narrowed; local governments are now restricted from enforcing cybersecurity standards on vendors that go beyond what the state establishes.
REQUIREMENT
Replaced language allowing local governments to adopt specific standards with a prohibition on local governments imposing standards on vendors that exceed state-established requirements.
Added a specific restriction preventing local governments from adopting or enforcing cybersecurity standards inconsistent with the new paragraph for contracts entered into or amended on or after July 1, 2026.
DEFINITION
Refined the definition of 'vendor' to explicitly include entities contracting with local governments to provide information technology commodities or services.
ENFORCEMENT
Clarified that local governments cannot enforce cybersecurity standards that conflict with the new state-level restrictions for future contracts.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Feb 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 2
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/10/26, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
upper
Jan 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
upper
Jan 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 01/26/26, 3:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced
upper
Dec 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Judiciary; Appropriations
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Leek
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 692
Scope: FL
Hi! I can help you understand SB 692. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline